YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Urban Planning and Development
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Urban Planning and Development
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Developing Methods for Grading the Accessibility of a Communality’s Infrastructure

    Source: Journal of Urban Planning and Development:;2012:;Volume ( 138 ):;issue: 003
    Author:
    Tom Seekins
    ,
    Nancy Arnold
    ,
    Catherine Ipsen
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000117
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: For people with disabilities, accessibility is a critical aspect of infrastructure that influences their health, quality of life, and ability to participate in community life. Currently, no standard methods exist for assessing a community’s accessibility or for accumulating such data across communities. ASCE’s report card on the status of America’s infrastructure offers a framework for collecting and aggregating data on accessibility, and for using it to advocate for community improvement. In the present study, an assessment for estimating a community’s accessibility was developed and pilot tested. The feasibility of the assessment method was tested by observing 297 randomly selected businesses in a city. Aggregated across nine access categories, the city scored 3.32 on a four-point scale, the equivalent of a grade of “B” on ASCE’s scale. However, 28 (10%) businesses met “access failure” criteria—having at least one barrier that precluded access to a person using a wheelchair. On average, infrastructure maintained by private businesses was more accessible than the same observed elements maintained by the municipality. This approach could be expanded to include other elements of community accessibility—transportation, housing, and information—to develop report cards on community accessibility at the local and state levels. Data on accessibility collected systematically and longitudinally would benefit policy makers, planners, and disability advocates. Achieving and maintaining the infrastructure’s accessibility would benefit everyone.
    • Download: (335.7Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Developing Methods for Grading the Accessibility of a Communality’s Infrastructure

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/69789
    Collections
    • Journal of Urban Planning and Development

    Show full item record

    contributor authorTom Seekins
    contributor authorNancy Arnold
    contributor authorCatherine Ipsen
    date accessioned2017-05-08T22:02:53Z
    date available2017-05-08T22:02:53Z
    date copyrightSeptember 2012
    date issued2012
    identifier other%28asce%29up%2E1943-5444%2E0000160.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/69789
    description abstractFor people with disabilities, accessibility is a critical aspect of infrastructure that influences their health, quality of life, and ability to participate in community life. Currently, no standard methods exist for assessing a community’s accessibility or for accumulating such data across communities. ASCE’s report card on the status of America’s infrastructure offers a framework for collecting and aggregating data on accessibility, and for using it to advocate for community improvement. In the present study, an assessment for estimating a community’s accessibility was developed and pilot tested. The feasibility of the assessment method was tested by observing 297 randomly selected businesses in a city. Aggregated across nine access categories, the city scored 3.32 on a four-point scale, the equivalent of a grade of “B” on ASCE’s scale. However, 28 (10%) businesses met “access failure” criteria—having at least one barrier that precluded access to a person using a wheelchair. On average, infrastructure maintained by private businesses was more accessible than the same observed elements maintained by the municipality. This approach could be expanded to include other elements of community accessibility—transportation, housing, and information—to develop report cards on community accessibility at the local and state levels. Data on accessibility collected systematically and longitudinally would benefit policy makers, planners, and disability advocates. Achieving and maintaining the infrastructure’s accessibility would benefit everyone.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleDeveloping Methods for Grading the Accessibility of a Communality’s Infrastructure
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume138
    journal issue3
    journal titleJournal of Urban Planning and Development
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000117
    treeJournal of Urban Planning and Development:;2012:;Volume ( 138 ):;issue: 003
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian