YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Options for Hauling Fully Loaded ISO Containers in the United States

    Source: Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems:;2012:;Volume ( 138 ):;issue: 006
    Author:
    Garreth Rempel
    ,
    Maryam Moshiri
    ,
    Craig Milligan
    ,
    Jason Bittner
    ,
    Jeannette Montufar
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000386
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: Civil engineers plan, design, manage, and guide investments in surface transportation. Truck weight limits are inextricably linked to the consideration of pavements, bridges, safety, asset management, sustainability, jobs, and economic productivity. The U.S. 36.3 t cap for gross vehicle weight (GVW), and the Federal Bridge Formula B (FBF B) constrain truck movement of 32.5 t full ISO (International Organization for Standardization) containers. This study identifies the options—and associated implications—for trucks to transport full containers notwithstanding FBF B and the cap. We conducted a national investigation of truck weight regulations across 50 states to identify options, with 28 cases involving telephone interviews. Results show the options are complex, vary by state, result in a patchwork of routes, and include: (1) nondivisible permits, (2) special haul routes, (3) grandfather rights, (4) state roads, (5) tare reduction, and (6) operation outside formal regulations. Containerships, railroads, ports, and highways of U.S. trading partners each accommodate full containers. Conditions identified in this paper can result in underutilization of the productivity and efficiency benefits afforded by international standardization.
    • Download: (240.4Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Options for Hauling Fully Loaded ISO Containers in the United States

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/69399
    Collections
    • Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems

    Show full item record

    contributor authorGarreth Rempel
    contributor authorMaryam Moshiri
    contributor authorCraig Milligan
    contributor authorJason Bittner
    contributor authorJeannette Montufar
    date accessioned2017-05-08T22:02:11Z
    date available2017-05-08T22:02:11Z
    date copyrightJune 2012
    date issued2012
    identifier other%28asce%29te%2E1943-5436%2E0000428.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/69399
    description abstractCivil engineers plan, design, manage, and guide investments in surface transportation. Truck weight limits are inextricably linked to the consideration of pavements, bridges, safety, asset management, sustainability, jobs, and economic productivity. The U.S. 36.3 t cap for gross vehicle weight (GVW), and the Federal Bridge Formula B (FBF B) constrain truck movement of 32.5 t full ISO (International Organization for Standardization) containers. This study identifies the options—and associated implications—for trucks to transport full containers notwithstanding FBF B and the cap. We conducted a national investigation of truck weight regulations across 50 states to identify options, with 28 cases involving telephone interviews. Results show the options are complex, vary by state, result in a patchwork of routes, and include: (1) nondivisible permits, (2) special haul routes, (3) grandfather rights, (4) state roads, (5) tare reduction, and (6) operation outside formal regulations. Containerships, railroads, ports, and highways of U.S. trading partners each accommodate full containers. Conditions identified in this paper can result in underutilization of the productivity and efficiency benefits afforded by international standardization.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleOptions for Hauling Fully Loaded ISO Containers in the United States
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume138
    journal issue6
    journal titleJournal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000386
    treeJournal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems:;2012:;Volume ( 138 ):;issue: 006
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian