YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Decision Analysis of Preferred Methods for Locating Underground Conduits

    Source: Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice:;2014:;Volume ( 005 ):;issue: 002
    Author:
    Fadi A. Karaa
    ,
    Al Katz
    ,
    Edip Niver
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)PS.1949-1204.0000162
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: The New Jersey DOT (NJDOT) operates and maintains a network of thousands of kilometers of conduits, many carrying fiber-optic cables that are vital to the state’s communication system. These primarily nonmetallic conduits frequently must be located and marked to avoid damage from construction. By design they can be located using a system of trace wires (TW) and radio-frequency detection. However, for various reasons the TW are missing and thus not functioning over a significant portion of the network. The purpose of the research reported in this paper was to analyze and improve the inventory information base, and find and compare effective methods for locating these conduits. Any candidate solution had to meet requirements for accuracy and depth sensitivity, be practical to implement, cost-effective, work with both metallic and plastic conduits, and be reliable. Innovative methods for locating underground conduits were investigated and evaluated with respect to various conditions. Validated approaches include enhancements to current TW methods, a new acoustic transmission (AT) method, and the ground-penetrating radar (GPR) method. The benefits of optimized location include the following: (1) reduced cost and time from more expedient systems for locating conduits, (2) less accidental damage to conduits, (3) avoidance of connectivity problems and loss of crucial communications, and (4) preservation of the fiber-optic network. A decision process identifying the optimal solution with respect to various conditions was developed and is presented in this paper. To enable the best application of the decision approach, the underlying conduit and surrounding-environment data was improved using cross-referenced geographic soil map data to enable proper selection of location technologies.
    • Download: (851.2Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Decision Analysis of Preferred Methods for Locating Underground Conduits

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/67703
    Collections
    • Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice

    Show full item record

    contributor authorFadi A. Karaa
    contributor authorAl Katz
    contributor authorEdip Niver
    date accessioned2017-05-08T21:58:11Z
    date available2017-05-08T21:58:11Z
    date copyrightMay 2014
    date issued2014
    identifier other%28asce%29sc%2E1943-5576%2E0000053.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/67703
    description abstractThe New Jersey DOT (NJDOT) operates and maintains a network of thousands of kilometers of conduits, many carrying fiber-optic cables that are vital to the state’s communication system. These primarily nonmetallic conduits frequently must be located and marked to avoid damage from construction. By design they can be located using a system of trace wires (TW) and radio-frequency detection. However, for various reasons the TW are missing and thus not functioning over a significant portion of the network. The purpose of the research reported in this paper was to analyze and improve the inventory information base, and find and compare effective methods for locating these conduits. Any candidate solution had to meet requirements for accuracy and depth sensitivity, be practical to implement, cost-effective, work with both metallic and plastic conduits, and be reliable. Innovative methods for locating underground conduits were investigated and evaluated with respect to various conditions. Validated approaches include enhancements to current TW methods, a new acoustic transmission (AT) method, and the ground-penetrating radar (GPR) method. The benefits of optimized location include the following: (1) reduced cost and time from more expedient systems for locating conduits, (2) less accidental damage to conduits, (3) avoidance of connectivity problems and loss of crucial communications, and (4) preservation of the fiber-optic network. A decision process identifying the optimal solution with respect to various conditions was developed and is presented in this paper. To enable the best application of the decision approach, the underlying conduit and surrounding-environment data was improved using cross-referenced geographic soil map data to enable proper selection of location technologies.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleDecision Analysis of Preferred Methods for Locating Underground Conduits
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume5
    journal issue2
    journal titleJournal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)PS.1949-1204.0000162
    treeJournal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice:;2014:;Volume ( 005 ):;issue: 002
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian