YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Expectation Analysis of the Probability of Failure for Water Supply Pipes

    Source: Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice:;2012:;Volume ( 003 ):;issue: 002
    Author:
    Amarjit Singh
    ,
    Stacy Adachi
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)PS.1949-1204.0000094
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: The probabilities of failure for cast iron (CI), ductile iron (DI), polyvinyl chloride (PVC), and concrete cylinder (CC) pipes were analyzed to determine the pipe type that failed most consistently at the Honolulu Board of Water Supply (HBWS). In understanding the process of the probability of failure over time, expected failure rates were calculated. A pipe type with a low and consistent probability of pipe failure was preferred for asset management over one that displayed a high and volatile probability of failure. The probability of failure was derived from the failure rate, assuming a Poisson distribution. The data for each pipe type was analyzed and compared by using control charts, operating characteristic (OC) curves, and process capability indexes. The results of the control charts showed that CC pipes were the most stable. According to the OC curves, in which the hypothesis created was that the probability of failure was less than the upper specification limit, CI pipes had the highest probability of accepting the hypothesis when true. PVC pipes showed a low probability of accepting the hypothesis within the specification limits, but also a low probability of false acceptance of the hypothesis. Finally, process capability analysis found that CI and PVC pipes were able to meet their desired failure specification limits. Overall results are mixed—CI pipes performed the best according to OC curves and process capability analysis; PVC pipes were seen as the worst through the use of control charts and OC curves; CC pipes were the most stable according to control charts, but the worst in process capability. A rank order structuring of failure expectations concluded that CI pipes were the best, whereas PVC pipes were the worst. However, this finding does not translate into recommendations for pipe design. It was observed that actual failure rates and expectation analysis are distinct aspects; the expected performance of a pipe is independent of its actual performance.
    • Download: (258.4Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Expectation Analysis of the Probability of Failure for Water Supply Pipes

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/67644
    Collections
    • Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice

    Show full item record

    contributor authorAmarjit Singh
    contributor authorStacy Adachi
    date accessioned2017-05-08T21:58:02Z
    date available2017-05-08T21:58:02Z
    date copyrightMay 2012
    date issued2012
    identifier other%28asce%29ps%2E1949-1204%2E0000142.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/67644
    description abstractThe probabilities of failure for cast iron (CI), ductile iron (DI), polyvinyl chloride (PVC), and concrete cylinder (CC) pipes were analyzed to determine the pipe type that failed most consistently at the Honolulu Board of Water Supply (HBWS). In understanding the process of the probability of failure over time, expected failure rates were calculated. A pipe type with a low and consistent probability of pipe failure was preferred for asset management over one that displayed a high and volatile probability of failure. The probability of failure was derived from the failure rate, assuming a Poisson distribution. The data for each pipe type was analyzed and compared by using control charts, operating characteristic (OC) curves, and process capability indexes. The results of the control charts showed that CC pipes were the most stable. According to the OC curves, in which the hypothesis created was that the probability of failure was less than the upper specification limit, CI pipes had the highest probability of accepting the hypothesis when true. PVC pipes showed a low probability of accepting the hypothesis within the specification limits, but also a low probability of false acceptance of the hypothesis. Finally, process capability analysis found that CI and PVC pipes were able to meet their desired failure specification limits. Overall results are mixed—CI pipes performed the best according to OC curves and process capability analysis; PVC pipes were seen as the worst through the use of control charts and OC curves; CC pipes were the most stable according to control charts, but the worst in process capability. A rank order structuring of failure expectations concluded that CI pipes were the best, whereas PVC pipes were the worst. However, this finding does not translate into recommendations for pipe design. It was observed that actual failure rates and expectation analysis are distinct aspects; the expected performance of a pipe is independent of its actual performance.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleExpectation Analysis of the Probability of Failure for Water Supply Pipes
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume3
    journal issue2
    journal titleJournal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)PS.1949-1204.0000094
    treeJournal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice:;2012:;Volume ( 003 ):;issue: 002
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian