YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Natural Hazards Review
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Natural Hazards Review
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Multiphase Risk-Management Method and Its Application in Tunnel Engineering

    Source: Natural Hazards Review:;2014:;Volume ( 015 ):;issue: 002
    Author:
    Yun
    ,
    Bai
    ,
    Zhiren
    ,
    Dai
    ,
    Weijie
    ,
    Zhu
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000124
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: For a better understanding of risk management and the optimization of risk mitigation, a multiphase risk-management method is proposed in which the assessment of risks is divided into two phases: the initial risk phase and the secondary risk phase. The initial risk phase is used for risk evaluation at the beginning of a project and can be quantified by the combination of probability and loss. If the initial risk is not acceptable, risk-mitigation measures are evaluated and the most appropriate measure will be adopted. The secondary risk phase involves identifying risks after implementing the selected mitigation measures for the initial risk, and the mitigation costs are also included. Obviously, the secondary risk must be lower than the initial risk. The task of a tunnel engineer is to select mitigation measures that result in the lowest secondary risk. During project execution, environmental factors may change, and deviations from the original design assumptions may take place. These phenomena have a knock-on effect on the risk profile, and a timely reevaluation of the risk scenario becomes necessary. Therefore, it is further proposed that the two-phase risk-evaluation process be extended to infinite phases. The novelty of the proposed method is characterized by its combination of a dynamic risk-management system and a timely reassessment of new risks, and the continuous tracking of risks until they are negligible. Finally, a relevant example of risk management using the proposed method is illustrated, in which the most appropriate and economical risk management was achieved, and the established objectives of the construction quality and timeline were ensured. This multiphase risk-management approach can be applied to tunnel engineering as well as other engineering fields.
    • Download: (1.040Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Multiphase Risk-Management Method and Its Application in Tunnel Engineering

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/67522
    Collections
    • Natural Hazards Review

    Show full item record

    contributor authorYun
    contributor authorBai
    contributor authorZhiren
    contributor authorDai
    contributor authorWeijie
    contributor authorZhu
    date accessioned2017-05-08T21:57:45Z
    date available2017-05-08T21:57:45Z
    date copyrightMay 2014
    date issued2014
    identifier other%28asce%29nm%2E2153-5477%2E0000059.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/67522
    description abstractFor a better understanding of risk management and the optimization of risk mitigation, a multiphase risk-management method is proposed in which the assessment of risks is divided into two phases: the initial risk phase and the secondary risk phase. The initial risk phase is used for risk evaluation at the beginning of a project and can be quantified by the combination of probability and loss. If the initial risk is not acceptable, risk-mitigation measures are evaluated and the most appropriate measure will be adopted. The secondary risk phase involves identifying risks after implementing the selected mitigation measures for the initial risk, and the mitigation costs are also included. Obviously, the secondary risk must be lower than the initial risk. The task of a tunnel engineer is to select mitigation measures that result in the lowest secondary risk. During project execution, environmental factors may change, and deviations from the original design assumptions may take place. These phenomena have a knock-on effect on the risk profile, and a timely reevaluation of the risk scenario becomes necessary. Therefore, it is further proposed that the two-phase risk-evaluation process be extended to infinite phases. The novelty of the proposed method is characterized by its combination of a dynamic risk-management system and a timely reassessment of new risks, and the continuous tracking of risks until they are negligible. Finally, a relevant example of risk management using the proposed method is illustrated, in which the most appropriate and economical risk management was achieved, and the established objectives of the construction quality and timeline were ensured. This multiphase risk-management approach can be applied to tunnel engineering as well as other engineering fields.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleMultiphase Risk-Management Method and Its Application in Tunnel Engineering
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume15
    journal issue2
    journal titleNatural Hazards Review
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000124
    treeNatural Hazards Review:;2014:;Volume ( 015 ):;issue: 002
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian