YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Natural Hazards Review
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Natural Hazards Review
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Earthquake Prediction and Disaster Preparedness: Interactive Analysis

    Source: Natural Hazards Review:;2010:;Volume ( 011 ):;issue: 004
    Author:
    C. Davis
    ,
    V. Keilis-Borok
    ,
    G. Molchan
    ,
    P. Shebalin
    ,
    P. Lahr
    ,
    C. Plumb
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000020
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: Recent studies in earthquake predictions, having time windows of several years and possibly down to several months, have led to a reformulation of the intertwined problems linking disaster preparedness with earthquake prediction. Given an earthquake prediction including a time window, magnitude, probability of false alarm, and geographic area, disaster managers and policy makers have to select an appropriate set of temporal preparedness measures to implement taking into account the prediction uncertainties. The “predictor” has certain freedom to choose appropriate trade-offs between different kinds of prediction errors to allow for adequate preparedness decisions to be made. Both problems belong to the broad field of decision making based on incomplete information regarding action costs, damage prevented, gains achieved, and the prediction uncertainty. A hypothetical water supply system is used to demonstrate how infrastructure owners, disaster managers, and policy makers can utilize earthquake predictions to prevent considerable damage by undertaking appropriate preparedness measures. The problem of jointly optimizing earthquake prediction and disaster preparedness is also briefly considered by taking advantage of the fact that the prediction algorithm designer has certain limited freedom to choose between the rate of false alarms and failures to predict, giving the disaster manager options to use different algorithm versions depending on specific situations within the area of alarm.
    • Download: (1.070Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Earthquake Prediction and Disaster Preparedness: Interactive Analysis

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/67417
    Collections
    • Natural Hazards Review

    Show full item record

    contributor authorC. Davis
    contributor authorV. Keilis-Borok
    contributor authorG. Molchan
    contributor authorP. Shebalin
    contributor authorP. Lahr
    contributor authorC. Plumb
    date accessioned2017-05-08T21:57:32Z
    date available2017-05-08T21:57:32Z
    date copyrightNovember 2010
    date issued2010
    identifier other%28asce%29nh%2E1527-6996%2E0000061.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/67417
    description abstractRecent studies in earthquake predictions, having time windows of several years and possibly down to several months, have led to a reformulation of the intertwined problems linking disaster preparedness with earthquake prediction. Given an earthquake prediction including a time window, magnitude, probability of false alarm, and geographic area, disaster managers and policy makers have to select an appropriate set of temporal preparedness measures to implement taking into account the prediction uncertainties. The “predictor” has certain freedom to choose appropriate trade-offs between different kinds of prediction errors to allow for adequate preparedness decisions to be made. Both problems belong to the broad field of decision making based on incomplete information regarding action costs, damage prevented, gains achieved, and the prediction uncertainty. A hypothetical water supply system is used to demonstrate how infrastructure owners, disaster managers, and policy makers can utilize earthquake predictions to prevent considerable damage by undertaking appropriate preparedness measures. The problem of jointly optimizing earthquake prediction and disaster preparedness is also briefly considered by taking advantage of the fact that the prediction algorithm designer has certain limited freedom to choose between the rate of false alarms and failures to predict, giving the disaster manager options to use different algorithm versions depending on specific situations within the area of alarm.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleEarthquake Prediction and Disaster Preparedness: Interactive Analysis
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume11
    journal issue4
    journal titleNatural Hazards Review
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000020
    treeNatural Hazards Review:;2010:;Volume ( 011 ):;issue: 004
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian