YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Management in Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Management in Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    BIM Acceptance Model in Construction Organizations

    Source: Journal of Management in Engineering:;2015:;Volume ( 031 ):;issue: 003
    Author:
    Seulki Lee
    ,
    Jungho Yu
    ,
    David Jeong
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000252
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: Substantial research has been performed on the data standards and exchanges in the Architectural, Engineering, Construction/Facility Management (AEC/FM) industry over the past several years. The growing popularity of building information modeling (BIM) technology is based heavily upon the perception that it can facilitate the sharing and reuse of information during a project life cycle. Although many researchers and practitioners are in agreement about the potential applicability and benefit of BIM in construction, it is still unclear why BIM is adopted, and what factors enhance implementation of BIM. Thus, BIM acceptance and use remains a central concern of BIM research and practice. Therefore, we propose an acceptance model for BIM in construction organizations using structural equation modeling (SEM). The key components, including the BIM acceptance model (BAM), are identified through a literature review about technology acceptance-behavior related theories, and was then consolidated by interviews and pilot studies with professionals in the construction industry. Based on the components, a questionnaire was designed and sent out to workers in construction organizations (such as contractors, architects, construction managers, and engineers) in South Korea. A total of 114 completed questionnaires were retrieved. We used SEM for hypothesis testing. The validated BAM can serve as a foundation for positioning and comparing BIM acceptance research and provides users with a framework for evaluating BIM acceptance.
    • Download: (1.151Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      BIM Acceptance Model in Construction Organizations

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/66306
    Collections
    • Journal of Management in Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorSeulki Lee
    contributor authorJungho Yu
    contributor authorDavid Jeong
    date accessioned2017-05-08T21:54:59Z
    date available2017-05-08T21:54:59Z
    date copyrightMay 2015
    date issued2015
    identifier other%28asce%29mt%2E1943-5533%2E0000003.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/66306
    description abstractSubstantial research has been performed on the data standards and exchanges in the Architectural, Engineering, Construction/Facility Management (AEC/FM) industry over the past several years. The growing popularity of building information modeling (BIM) technology is based heavily upon the perception that it can facilitate the sharing and reuse of information during a project life cycle. Although many researchers and practitioners are in agreement about the potential applicability and benefit of BIM in construction, it is still unclear why BIM is adopted, and what factors enhance implementation of BIM. Thus, BIM acceptance and use remains a central concern of BIM research and practice. Therefore, we propose an acceptance model for BIM in construction organizations using structural equation modeling (SEM). The key components, including the BIM acceptance model (BAM), are identified through a literature review about technology acceptance-behavior related theories, and was then consolidated by interviews and pilot studies with professionals in the construction industry. Based on the components, a questionnaire was designed and sent out to workers in construction organizations (such as contractors, architects, construction managers, and engineers) in South Korea. A total of 114 completed questionnaires were retrieved. We used SEM for hypothesis testing. The validated BAM can serve as a foundation for positioning and comparing BIM acceptance research and provides users with a framework for evaluating BIM acceptance.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleBIM Acceptance Model in Construction Organizations
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume31
    journal issue3
    journal titleJournal of Management in Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000252
    treeJournal of Management in Engineering:;2015:;Volume ( 031 ):;issue: 003
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian