YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Project Benchmarking: Tool for Mitigating Conflicts, Claims, and Disputes through Improved Performance

    Source: Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction:;2014:;Volume ( 006 ):;issue: 001
    Author:
    Philip S. LaBarre
    ,
    Islam H. El-adaway
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000140
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: The construction industry significantly contributes to the U.S. economy. However, this important industry is negatively affected with many challenges including safety issues, design errors, delay, and changes. To this end, performance measurement has become a commonly used tool for evaluating processes, managing human resources, and formulating corrective strategies. One of the most important aspects of performance measurement is the ability to perform benchmarking. Using case studies of projects carried out by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) in its Vicksburg District, this paper investigates how benchmarking can be used to evaluate and measure performance of the associated contractors, and thus mitigate conflicts, claims, and disputes. The utilized methodology encompassed three interdependent steps in which the writers: (1) collected project data for 40 contractors who performed work for USACE using file reviews for submittals, requests for informations (RFIs), claims, progress reports, and internal evaluation forms by the associated senior project managers; (2) defined the associated performance measures; and (3) analyzed the results to identify areas in which contractors needed to improve performance. The writers utilized five performance measures including quality control, timely performance, and effectiveness of management, compliance with labor standards, and compliance with safety standards. These measures were applied on a five-point rating system and categorized by using three characteristic groups, including use of subcontractors, contract modifications, and final contract price. It was shown that contractors who had higher performance measures did actually have fewer contractual and legal problems—either during construction or after completion—than those with lower ratings. Also, contractors with an outstanding rating in one area never had a contractual and legal problem in that area. This research supports the effectiveness of benchmarking as a tool to promote changes within the construction industry based on knowing strengths and weaknesses. The findings should better help contractors and owners complete their projects on time, more safely, and with fewer errors and changes.
    • Download: (146.2Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Project Benchmarking: Tool for Mitigating Conflicts, Claims, and Disputes through Improved Performance

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/65900
    Collections
    • Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction

    Show full item record

    contributor authorPhilip S. LaBarre
    contributor authorIslam H. El-adaway
    date accessioned2017-05-08T21:54:09Z
    date available2017-05-08T21:54:09Z
    date copyrightFebruary 2014
    date issued2014
    identifier other%28asce%29lm%2E1943-5630%2E0000078.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/65900
    description abstractThe construction industry significantly contributes to the U.S. economy. However, this important industry is negatively affected with many challenges including safety issues, design errors, delay, and changes. To this end, performance measurement has become a commonly used tool for evaluating processes, managing human resources, and formulating corrective strategies. One of the most important aspects of performance measurement is the ability to perform benchmarking. Using case studies of projects carried out by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) in its Vicksburg District, this paper investigates how benchmarking can be used to evaluate and measure performance of the associated contractors, and thus mitigate conflicts, claims, and disputes. The utilized methodology encompassed three interdependent steps in which the writers: (1) collected project data for 40 contractors who performed work for USACE using file reviews for submittals, requests for informations (RFIs), claims, progress reports, and internal evaluation forms by the associated senior project managers; (2) defined the associated performance measures; and (3) analyzed the results to identify areas in which contractors needed to improve performance. The writers utilized five performance measures including quality control, timely performance, and effectiveness of management, compliance with labor standards, and compliance with safety standards. These measures were applied on a five-point rating system and categorized by using three characteristic groups, including use of subcontractors, contract modifications, and final contract price. It was shown that contractors who had higher performance measures did actually have fewer contractual and legal problems—either during construction or after completion—than those with lower ratings. Also, contractors with an outstanding rating in one area never had a contractual and legal problem in that area. This research supports the effectiveness of benchmarking as a tool to promote changes within the construction industry based on knowing strengths and weaknesses. The findings should better help contractors and owners complete their projects on time, more safely, and with fewer errors and changes.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleProject Benchmarking: Tool for Mitigating Conflicts, Claims, and Disputes through Improved Performance
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume6
    journal issue1
    journal titleJournal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000140
    treeJournal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction:;2014:;Volume ( 006 ):;issue: 001
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian