YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Arbitration in Kuwait: Study of Current Practices and Suggestions for Improvements

    Source: Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction:;2014:;Volume ( 006 ):;issue: 001
    Author:
    H. M. Al-Humaidi
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000128
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: In the construction industry, disputes are inevitable. Contract disputes result from conflicting contract documents, changes to the original scope of work, or breaches of contract. Arbitration is the preferred alternative dispute resolution method in international construction contracts because it saves time and money and prevents litigation under foreign laws. Western contractors and investors fear entering into contracts with Middle Eastern owners and government entities, especially when a contract stipulates the application of local national laws and jurisdiction. Furthermore, questions regarding foreign contractors’ rights and the validity of certain contractual provisions for dispute resolution in local courts and their ability to use arbitration to resolve disputes need to be addressed. This paper examines the concept of arbitration as an alternative dispute resolution method and its application in the Kuwaiti construction industry. The paper focuses on Kuwaiti arbitration law, examines current procedures under this law, critiques pitfalls in the law, and recommends a real arbitration system for the state of Kuwait. Data show that the use of litigation to resolve cases far exceeds arbitration. The average number of disputes resolved annually using judiciary arbitration is 4.5, which does not exceed 0.39% of all cases resolved using domestic arbitration and litigation for the years 2006–2011. The average number of disputes resolved using international arbitration with one party from Kuwait is 6, which represents a percentage of international arbitration to litigation that does not exceed 0.55% for the years 2006–2011. The average number of disputes resolved using international arbitration with all parties from Kuwait is 5.33, which represents a percentage of international arbitration to litigation that does not exceed 0.46% for the years 2006–2011. The average number of disputes resolved using litigation is 1,156.67 for the years 2006–2011. The time needed to resolve a dispute using litigation was an average of 5.5 years; however, the average time needed to resolve disputes using judiciary arbitration was 8.84 months. The average time needed to resolve a conflict is 3–6 months. Most cases in Kuwait are resolved using litigation. Statistics obtained for this study show a very limited use of domestic and international arbitration when compared with litigation, which indicates a need to enhance current legislation and practices related to arbitration in Kuwait.
    • Download: (106.8Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Arbitration in Kuwait: Study of Current Practices and Suggestions for Improvements

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/65886
    Collections
    • Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction

    Show full item record

    contributor authorH. M. Al-Humaidi
    date accessioned2017-05-08T21:54:08Z
    date available2017-05-08T21:54:08Z
    date copyrightFebruary 2014
    date issued2014
    identifier other%28asce%29lm%2E1943-5630%2E0000057.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/65886
    description abstractIn the construction industry, disputes are inevitable. Contract disputes result from conflicting contract documents, changes to the original scope of work, or breaches of contract. Arbitration is the preferred alternative dispute resolution method in international construction contracts because it saves time and money and prevents litigation under foreign laws. Western contractors and investors fear entering into contracts with Middle Eastern owners and government entities, especially when a contract stipulates the application of local national laws and jurisdiction. Furthermore, questions regarding foreign contractors’ rights and the validity of certain contractual provisions for dispute resolution in local courts and their ability to use arbitration to resolve disputes need to be addressed. This paper examines the concept of arbitration as an alternative dispute resolution method and its application in the Kuwaiti construction industry. The paper focuses on Kuwaiti arbitration law, examines current procedures under this law, critiques pitfalls in the law, and recommends a real arbitration system for the state of Kuwait. Data show that the use of litigation to resolve cases far exceeds arbitration. The average number of disputes resolved annually using judiciary arbitration is 4.5, which does not exceed 0.39% of all cases resolved using domestic arbitration and litigation for the years 2006–2011. The average number of disputes resolved using international arbitration with one party from Kuwait is 6, which represents a percentage of international arbitration to litigation that does not exceed 0.55% for the years 2006–2011. The average number of disputes resolved using international arbitration with all parties from Kuwait is 5.33, which represents a percentage of international arbitration to litigation that does not exceed 0.46% for the years 2006–2011. The average number of disputes resolved using litigation is 1,156.67 for the years 2006–2011. The time needed to resolve a dispute using litigation was an average of 5.5 years; however, the average time needed to resolve disputes using judiciary arbitration was 8.84 months. The average time needed to resolve a conflict is 3–6 months. Most cases in Kuwait are resolved using litigation. Statistics obtained for this study show a very limited use of domestic and international arbitration when compared with litigation, which indicates a need to enhance current legislation and practices related to arbitration in Kuwait.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleArbitration in Kuwait: Study of Current Practices and Suggestions for Improvements
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume6
    journal issue1
    journal titleJournal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000128
    treeJournal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction:;2014:;Volume ( 006 ):;issue: 001
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian