YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Alignment Partnering: A Bridge to ADR Processes?

    Source: Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction:;2013:;Volume ( 005 ):;issue: 002
    Author:
    Kurt Dettman
    ,
    Dick Bayer
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000107
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: Partnering is a well-established concept in the construction industry that addresses an old problem: How can a construction project get the collaborative participation of all project stakeholders and keep that collaboration going throughout the life cycle of the project? Alternative dispute resolution (ADR) tools such as mediation, dispute review boards, and arbitration (ADR processes) are other established concepts that address another old problem: When disputes arise on a construction project, how can the parties implement an effective, efficient process to resolve the issue in a timely manner at the project level? Neither approach alone responds to all the conflicts, disputes, and claims that develop on construction projects. For instance, partnering can foster negotiation and agreement among the parties on real-time issue resolution, but ADR Processes may be needed to provide authoritative mechanisms for third-party intervention if the parties have not been able to resolve disputes. The authors advocate that construction projects should design a proactive system that employs a coordinated continuum of processes ranging from collaborative partnering to more prescriptive ADR processes. These processes should not be used in isolation, but instead be part of a more complete project dispute risk management plan for dispute avoidance and resolution.
    • Download: (11.41Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Alignment Partnering: A Bridge to ADR Processes?

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/65864
    Collections
    • Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction

    Show full item record

    contributor authorKurt Dettman
    contributor authorDick Bayer
    date accessioned2017-05-08T21:54:05Z
    date available2017-05-08T21:54:05Z
    date copyrightMay 2013
    date issued2013
    identifier other%28asce%29la%2E1943-4170%2E0000136.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/65864
    description abstractPartnering is a well-established concept in the construction industry that addresses an old problem: How can a construction project get the collaborative participation of all project stakeholders and keep that collaboration going throughout the life cycle of the project? Alternative dispute resolution (ADR) tools such as mediation, dispute review boards, and arbitration (ADR processes) are other established concepts that address another old problem: When disputes arise on a construction project, how can the parties implement an effective, efficient process to resolve the issue in a timely manner at the project level? Neither approach alone responds to all the conflicts, disputes, and claims that develop on construction projects. For instance, partnering can foster negotiation and agreement among the parties on real-time issue resolution, but ADR Processes may be needed to provide authoritative mechanisms for third-party intervention if the parties have not been able to resolve disputes. The authors advocate that construction projects should design a proactive system that employs a coordinated continuum of processes ranging from collaborative partnering to more prescriptive ADR processes. These processes should not be used in isolation, but instead be part of a more complete project dispute risk management plan for dispute avoidance and resolution.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleAlignment Partnering: A Bridge to ADR Processes?
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume5
    journal issue2
    journal titleJournal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000107
    treeJournal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction:;2013:;Volume ( 005 ):;issue: 002
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian