YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Contract Administration Guidelines for U.S. Contractors Working under World Bank–Funded Projects

    Source: Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction:;2012:;Volume ( 004 ):;issue: 002
    Author:
    Salwa A. Fawzy
    ,
    Islam H. El-adaway
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000088
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: Today’s globalized construction industry requires more integration and collaboration between various multinational and multicultural stakeholders. Many U.S. contractors are involved in large-scale projects that are funded in whole or in part by the World Bank. These projects are managed through the Standard Bidding Documents for Procurement of Works (SBDW). The Conditions of Contract included in the SBDW (i.e., WB contract) are based extensively on the Conditions of Contract for Construction published by the International Federation of Consulting Engineers (FIDIC). Most of the U.S. contractors are more familiar with the families of contracts issued by the American Institute of Architects Conditions of Contract (namely, the A201) and are less familiar with the FIDIC Conditions of Contract. This paper presents contract administration guidelines for U.S. contractors working under World Bank–funded projects. The authors highlight the WB contract’s fundamental administrative issues, including the role of the Bank, the responsibilities of the engineer, commencement, instructions, approvals, delays and extension of time, acceleration, and payment provisions. For each guideline, the authors compare the associated SBDW provisions with their respective ones under the FIDIC’s editions issued in 1987 and 1999. It is perceived that such in-depth analysis will help U.S. contractors better understand the evolution of the philosophy governing the development of SBDW contracts and consequently help them better manage their associated projects.
    • Download: (616.9Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Contract Administration Guidelines for U.S. Contractors Working under World Bank–Funded Projects

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/65847
    Collections
    • Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction

    Show full item record

    contributor authorSalwa A. Fawzy
    contributor authorIslam H. El-adaway
    date accessioned2017-05-08T21:54:04Z
    date available2017-05-08T21:54:04Z
    date copyrightMay 2012
    date issued2012
    identifier other%28asce%29la%2E1943-4170%2E0000119.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/65847
    description abstractToday’s globalized construction industry requires more integration and collaboration between various multinational and multicultural stakeholders. Many U.S. contractors are involved in large-scale projects that are funded in whole or in part by the World Bank. These projects are managed through the Standard Bidding Documents for Procurement of Works (SBDW). The Conditions of Contract included in the SBDW (i.e., WB contract) are based extensively on the Conditions of Contract for Construction published by the International Federation of Consulting Engineers (FIDIC). Most of the U.S. contractors are more familiar with the families of contracts issued by the American Institute of Architects Conditions of Contract (namely, the A201) and are less familiar with the FIDIC Conditions of Contract. This paper presents contract administration guidelines for U.S. contractors working under World Bank–funded projects. The authors highlight the WB contract’s fundamental administrative issues, including the role of the Bank, the responsibilities of the engineer, commencement, instructions, approvals, delays and extension of time, acceleration, and payment provisions. For each guideline, the authors compare the associated SBDW provisions with their respective ones under the FIDIC’s editions issued in 1987 and 1999. It is perceived that such in-depth analysis will help U.S. contractors better understand the evolution of the philosophy governing the development of SBDW contracts and consequently help them better manage their associated projects.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleContract Administration Guidelines for U.S. Contractors Working under World Bank–Funded Projects
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume4
    journal issue2
    journal titleJournal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000088
    treeJournal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction:;2012:;Volume ( 004 ):;issue: 002
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian