YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Performance of Rain Delay Features on Signal-Based Evapotranspiration Irrigation Controllers

    Source: Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering:;2012:;Volume ( 138 ):;issue: 011
    Author:
    D. C. Rutland
    ,
    M. D. Dukes
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0000499
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: Evapotranspiration-based irrigation controllers, also known as weather-based irrigation controllers, are a new water-saving technology that use evapotranspiration (ET) estimates to schedule irrigation. Many ET controllers have the ability to incorporate rainfall events into irrigation scheduling using onsite sensors attached to the controller or weather updates through weather-monitoring services. The Toro Intelli-Sense controller can use an onsite rain sensor (rain switch) that immediately interrupts irrigation or a weather service that causes the controller to enter a rain pause mode to incorporate rainfall into irrigation scheduling. Four treatments were created using the combination of rain delay features: no rain delay features (TN), rain pause (TRP), rain switch (TRS), and both rain delay features (TRP-RS). A fixed-time irrigation schedule with a rain switch and a fixed-time irrigation schedule without a rain switch were created for comparison: T, timer with a rain switch; and TWORS, timer without a rain switch. During relatively dry periods (72% below historical seasonal rainfall) neither rain pause nor the rain switch resulted in irrigation reduction. However, during periods of rainfall (84% of historically rainy days), both features resulted in significant irrigation savings. The combination of rain switch and rain pause reduced irrigation 41% compared with the use of no rain features, whereas the rain pause feature alone saved 25%. Because of the variability of rainfall in humid climates, using both a rain switch and the rain pause feature is recommended to delay irrigation on the Toro Intelli-Sense controller.
    • Download: (420.1Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Performance of Rain Delay Features on Signal-Based Evapotranspiration Irrigation Controllers

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/65408
    Collections
    • Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorD. C. Rutland
    contributor authorM. D. Dukes
    date accessioned2017-05-08T21:53:16Z
    date available2017-05-08T21:53:16Z
    date copyrightNovember 2012
    date issued2012
    identifier other%28asce%29ir%2E1943-4774%2E0000526.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/65408
    description abstractEvapotranspiration-based irrigation controllers, also known as weather-based irrigation controllers, are a new water-saving technology that use evapotranspiration (ET) estimates to schedule irrigation. Many ET controllers have the ability to incorporate rainfall events into irrigation scheduling using onsite sensors attached to the controller or weather updates through weather-monitoring services. The Toro Intelli-Sense controller can use an onsite rain sensor (rain switch) that immediately interrupts irrigation or a weather service that causes the controller to enter a rain pause mode to incorporate rainfall into irrigation scheduling. Four treatments were created using the combination of rain delay features: no rain delay features (TN), rain pause (TRP), rain switch (TRS), and both rain delay features (TRP-RS). A fixed-time irrigation schedule with a rain switch and a fixed-time irrigation schedule without a rain switch were created for comparison: T, timer with a rain switch; and TWORS, timer without a rain switch. During relatively dry periods (72% below historical seasonal rainfall) neither rain pause nor the rain switch resulted in irrigation reduction. However, during periods of rainfall (84% of historically rainy days), both features resulted in significant irrigation savings. The combination of rain switch and rain pause reduced irrigation 41% compared with the use of no rain features, whereas the rain pause feature alone saved 25%. Because of the variability of rainfall in humid climates, using both a rain switch and the rain pause feature is recommended to delay irrigation on the Toro Intelli-Sense controller.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titlePerformance of Rain Delay Features on Signal-Based Evapotranspiration Irrigation Controllers
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume138
    journal issue11
    journal titleJournal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0000499
    treeJournal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering:;2012:;Volume ( 138 ):;issue: 011
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian