YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Ultrasonic Flow Measurement for Pipe Installations with Nonideal Conditions

    Source: Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering:;2012:;Volume ( 138 ):;issue: 011
    Author:
    Devin M. Stoker
    ,
    Steven L. Barfuss
    ,
    Michael C. Johnson
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0000486
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: In the arid Western United States, water is among the most valuable resources. Typically, to successfully and accurately measure a flow rate using most types of flow meters, it is recommended that a straight section of pipe be installed immediately upstream from the flow meter to avoid distorted flow patterns and extreme turbulence at the metering location. In many field piping situations, however, such flow conditions are impossible to achieve. The portable ultrasonic flow meter (USFM) is a commonly used flow meter for field flow measurements in closed conduits and emits two ultrasonic signals across the cross section of pipe. One signal travels with the direction of the flow, and the other travels against the flow. The difference in signal travel time is then used along with the known geometry of the pipe to calculate the average flow velocity of the fluid. The performance of an USFM in nonideal piping scenarios was studied using laboratory experiments and numerical computational fluid dynamics (CFD) models. A transit-time USFM was used downstream of a single 12-in.-long radius elbow, and the error in flow measurement resulting from the flow disturbance was measured. Physical model tests were performed at four locations downstream of the elbow, at three orientations on the circumference of the pipe, and for three flow rates with Reynolds numbers ranging from 250,000 to 750,000. Numerical models were also utilized and the resulting velocity profiles were used to integrate the velocity of the flow across the ultrasonic signal path. The velocity profiles were compared to similar profiles for fully developed flow to determine the error in flow measurement. The USFM measurement errors downstream of the elbow were always negative and were found to be as great as
    • Download: (860.3Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Ultrasonic Flow Measurement for Pipe Installations with Nonideal Conditions

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/65393
    Collections
    • Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorDevin M. Stoker
    contributor authorSteven L. Barfuss
    contributor authorMichael C. Johnson
    date accessioned2017-05-08T21:53:15Z
    date available2017-05-08T21:53:15Z
    date copyrightNovember 2012
    date issued2012
    identifier other%28asce%29ir%2E1943-4774%2E0000513.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/65393
    description abstractIn the arid Western United States, water is among the most valuable resources. Typically, to successfully and accurately measure a flow rate using most types of flow meters, it is recommended that a straight section of pipe be installed immediately upstream from the flow meter to avoid distorted flow patterns and extreme turbulence at the metering location. In many field piping situations, however, such flow conditions are impossible to achieve. The portable ultrasonic flow meter (USFM) is a commonly used flow meter for field flow measurements in closed conduits and emits two ultrasonic signals across the cross section of pipe. One signal travels with the direction of the flow, and the other travels against the flow. The difference in signal travel time is then used along with the known geometry of the pipe to calculate the average flow velocity of the fluid. The performance of an USFM in nonideal piping scenarios was studied using laboratory experiments and numerical computational fluid dynamics (CFD) models. A transit-time USFM was used downstream of a single 12-in.-long radius elbow, and the error in flow measurement resulting from the flow disturbance was measured. Physical model tests were performed at four locations downstream of the elbow, at three orientations on the circumference of the pipe, and for three flow rates with Reynolds numbers ranging from 250,000 to 750,000. Numerical models were also utilized and the resulting velocity profiles were used to integrate the velocity of the flow across the ultrasonic signal path. The velocity profiles were compared to similar profiles for fully developed flow to determine the error in flow measurement. The USFM measurement errors downstream of the elbow were always negative and were found to be as great as
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleUltrasonic Flow Measurement for Pipe Installations with Nonideal Conditions
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume138
    journal issue11
    journal titleJournal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0000486
    treeJournal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering:;2012:;Volume ( 138 ):;issue: 011
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian