YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Comparison of Methods to Estimate Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity in Texas Soils with Grass

    Source: Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering:;2012:;Volume ( 138 ):;issue: 004
    Author:
    Runbin Duan
    ,
    Clifford B. Fedler
    ,
    John Borrelli
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0000407
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: One of the primary objectives for irrigation and drainage engineers, soil physicists, and hydrologists is to develop effective methods to estimate soil saturated hydraulic conductivity on the basis of readily available soil survey data. Although a few models have been derived from large ranges of soil texture data and successfully applied to many kinds of hydrologic analysis of agricultural lands and watershed for many years, there are few efforts to specifically investigate these models in soils with healthy grass growing. A field study was conducted to investigate and compare the performance of three readily applied models, including the Campbell model, Smettem and Bristow model, and Saxton et al. model, in Texas soils with established grass from September 2009 to May 2010. The results showed that two-parameter models, Campbell and Saxton et al. models, had better performance than the one-parameter model, Smettem and Bristow model. All three models need to be calibrated with local knowledge and data for improved accuracy if they are applied in Texas grassed soils, or even some new methods or models need to be developed with acceptable accuracy and the same simplicity level as these investigated models.
    • Download: (1.501Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Comparison of Methods to Estimate Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity in Texas Soils with Grass

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/65308
    Collections
    • Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorRunbin Duan
    contributor authorClifford B. Fedler
    contributor authorJohn Borrelli
    date accessioned2017-05-08T21:53:04Z
    date available2017-05-08T21:53:04Z
    date copyrightApril 2012
    date issued2012
    identifier other%28asce%29ir%2E1943-4774%2E0000435.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/65308
    description abstractOne of the primary objectives for irrigation and drainage engineers, soil physicists, and hydrologists is to develop effective methods to estimate soil saturated hydraulic conductivity on the basis of readily available soil survey data. Although a few models have been derived from large ranges of soil texture data and successfully applied to many kinds of hydrologic analysis of agricultural lands and watershed for many years, there are few efforts to specifically investigate these models in soils with healthy grass growing. A field study was conducted to investigate and compare the performance of three readily applied models, including the Campbell model, Smettem and Bristow model, and Saxton et al. model, in Texas soils with established grass from September 2009 to May 2010. The results showed that two-parameter models, Campbell and Saxton et al. models, had better performance than the one-parameter model, Smettem and Bristow model. All three models need to be calibrated with local knowledge and data for improved accuracy if they are applied in Texas grassed soils, or even some new methods or models need to be developed with acceptable accuracy and the same simplicity level as these investigated models.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleComparison of Methods to Estimate Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity in Texas Soils with Grass
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume138
    journal issue4
    journal titleJournal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0000407
    treeJournal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering:;2012:;Volume ( 138 ):;issue: 004
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian