YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Infiltration Evaluation Strategy for Border Irrigation Management

    Source: Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering:;2011:;Volume ( 137 ):;issue: 009
    Author:
    N. S. Raghuwanshi
    ,
    Rajat Saha
    ,
    Damodhara R. Mailapalli
    ,
    S. K. Upadhyaya
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0000329
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: Water infiltration into soil plays a vital role in the performance of surface irrigation. Real-time information on infiltration characteristics is necessary to use surface irrigation models to manage irrigation systems. The present field study deals with the evaluation of the Kostiakov infiltration parameters using water front advance information at three different locations (50, 75, and 100% of the field length) along the alfalfa irrigated borders. Two irrigations were conducted on four border checks. The parameters of the Kostiakov infiltration model were determined using the one-point and two-point methods for these locations. The infiltration parameters for each border were used in a surface irrigation model to evaluate their impact on irrigation performance measures. The mean irrigation performance measures, such as inflow volume, application efficiency, tailwater ratio, deep percolation ratio, and low quarter distribution uniformity, were significantly different for one-point and two-point methods. However, the mean performance measures were not significantly different for infiltration functions evaluated at three different locations using the two-point method. Furthermore, performance of individual irrigation events was in close agreement for all three locations. Thus, infiltration parameters can be estimated using the water front advance information up to 75% of the field length (to reduce the impact of soil spatial variability) and can be used to predict irrigation performance measures reasonably well. A cutoff strategy that ensures the advancement of the wetting front to the downstream end of the field was devised on the basis of the infiltration parameters evaluated at 75% of the field length. This cutoff strategy resulted in savings of applied water (18%) and reduction in both tailwater and deep percolation losses, which gave higher application efficiency. The methodology presented in this article has the potential for use in real-time management of border irrigation systems.
    • Download: (700.4Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Infiltration Evaluation Strategy for Border Irrigation Management

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/65226
    Collections
    • Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorN. S. Raghuwanshi
    contributor authorRajat Saha
    contributor authorDamodhara R. Mailapalli
    contributor authorS. K. Upadhyaya
    date accessioned2017-05-08T21:52:56Z
    date available2017-05-08T21:52:56Z
    date copyrightSeptember 2011
    date issued2011
    identifier other%28asce%29ir%2E1943-4774%2E0000358.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/65226
    description abstractWater infiltration into soil plays a vital role in the performance of surface irrigation. Real-time information on infiltration characteristics is necessary to use surface irrigation models to manage irrigation systems. The present field study deals with the evaluation of the Kostiakov infiltration parameters using water front advance information at three different locations (50, 75, and 100% of the field length) along the alfalfa irrigated borders. Two irrigations were conducted on four border checks. The parameters of the Kostiakov infiltration model were determined using the one-point and two-point methods for these locations. The infiltration parameters for each border were used in a surface irrigation model to evaluate their impact on irrigation performance measures. The mean irrigation performance measures, such as inflow volume, application efficiency, tailwater ratio, deep percolation ratio, and low quarter distribution uniformity, were significantly different for one-point and two-point methods. However, the mean performance measures were not significantly different for infiltration functions evaluated at three different locations using the two-point method. Furthermore, performance of individual irrigation events was in close agreement for all three locations. Thus, infiltration parameters can be estimated using the water front advance information up to 75% of the field length (to reduce the impact of soil spatial variability) and can be used to predict irrigation performance measures reasonably well. A cutoff strategy that ensures the advancement of the wetting front to the downstream end of the field was devised on the basis of the infiltration parameters evaluated at 75% of the field length. This cutoff strategy resulted in savings of applied water (18%) and reduction in both tailwater and deep percolation losses, which gave higher application efficiency. The methodology presented in this article has the potential for use in real-time management of border irrigation systems.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleInfiltration Evaluation Strategy for Border Irrigation Management
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume137
    journal issue9
    journal titleJournal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0000329
    treeJournal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering:;2011:;Volume ( 137 ):;issue: 009
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian