YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Extreme Rainfall Nonstationarity Investigation and Intensity–Frequency–Duration Relationship

    Source: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering:;2014:;Volume ( 019 ):;issue: 006
    Author:
    A. G. Yilmaz
    ,
    B. J. C. Perera
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000878
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: Nonstationary behavior of recent climate increases concerns among hydrologists about the currently used design rainfall estimates. Therefore, it is necessary to perform an analysis to confirm stationarity or detect nonstationarity of extreme rainfall data to derive accurate design rainfall estimates for infrastructure projects and flood mitigation works. An extreme rainfall nonstationarity analysis of the storm durations from 6 min to 72 h was conducted in this study using data from the Melbourne Regional Office station in Melbourne, Australia, for the period of 1925–2010. Stationary generalized extreme value (GEV) models were constructed to obtain intensity–frequency–duration relationships for these storm durations using data from two time periods, 1925–1966 and 1967–2010, after identifying the year 1967 as the change-point year. Design rainfall estimates of the stationary models for the two periods were compared to identify the possible changes. Nonstationary GEV models, which were developed for storm durations that showed statistically significant extreme rainfall trends, did not show an advantage over stationary GEV models. There was no evidence of nonstationarity according to stationarity tests, despite the presence of statistically significant extreme rainfall trends. The developed methodology consisting of trend and nonstationarity tests, change point analysis, and stationary and nonstationary GEV models was demonstrated successfully using the data from the selected station.
    • Download: (1.626Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Extreme Rainfall Nonstationarity Investigation and Intensity–Frequency–Duration Relationship

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/63768
    Collections
    • Journal of Hydrologic Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorA. G. Yilmaz
    contributor authorB. J. C. Perera
    date accessioned2017-05-08T21:50:14Z
    date available2017-05-08T21:50:14Z
    date copyrightJune 2014
    date issued2014
    identifier other%28asce%29he%2E1943-5584%2E0000910.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/63768
    description abstractNonstationary behavior of recent climate increases concerns among hydrologists about the currently used design rainfall estimates. Therefore, it is necessary to perform an analysis to confirm stationarity or detect nonstationarity of extreme rainfall data to derive accurate design rainfall estimates for infrastructure projects and flood mitigation works. An extreme rainfall nonstationarity analysis of the storm durations from 6 min to 72 h was conducted in this study using data from the Melbourne Regional Office station in Melbourne, Australia, for the period of 1925–2010. Stationary generalized extreme value (GEV) models were constructed to obtain intensity–frequency–duration relationships for these storm durations using data from two time periods, 1925–1966 and 1967–2010, after identifying the year 1967 as the change-point year. Design rainfall estimates of the stationary models for the two periods were compared to identify the possible changes. Nonstationary GEV models, which were developed for storm durations that showed statistically significant extreme rainfall trends, did not show an advantage over stationary GEV models. There was no evidence of nonstationarity according to stationarity tests, despite the presence of statistically significant extreme rainfall trends. The developed methodology consisting of trend and nonstationarity tests, change point analysis, and stationary and nonstationary GEV models was demonstrated successfully using the data from the selected station.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleExtreme Rainfall Nonstationarity Investigation and Intensity–Frequency–Duration Relationship
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume19
    journal issue6
    journal titleJournal of Hydrologic Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000878
    treeJournal of Hydrologic Engineering:;2014:;Volume ( 019 ):;issue: 006
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian