YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Application of a Distributed Hydrologic Model to the November 17, 2004, Flood of Bull Creek Watershed, Austin, Texas

    Source: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering:;2010:;Volume ( 015 ):;issue: 008
    Author:
    Hatim O. Sharif
    ,
    Leon Sparks
    ,
    Almoutaz A. Hassan
    ,
    Jon Zeitler
    ,
    Hongjie Xie
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000228
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: This study presents a hydrologic analysis of a flood event that took place over a small urbanizing watershed in Austin, Texas. The physically based, distributed-parameter gridded surface subsurface hydrologic analysis (GSSHA) hydrologic model was used to simulate the watershed response to a very high-intensity rain event. The hydrologic model was forced by both gauge-observed and multisensor precipitation estimator (MPE) rainfall input. Observed discharge was compared to GSSHA-generated hydrograph under various degrees of representation of the watershed physiography. In addition, simulation hydrographs by GSSHA using five different model grid sizes were compared in order to evaluate the effect of grid size on model predictions. The simulation hydrograph for the model using a 30-m grid cell generally compared well to the observed flow data once the effects of storm water detention were simulated. The comparison of simulation results from models using 30, 60, 90, 120, and 150 m grid size highlighted the loss of accuracy as the model grid size is increased. Driving the hydrologic model by data from the two rain gauges existing on the watershed resulted in significant overestimation of the runoff.
    • Download: (327.0Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Application of a Distributed Hydrologic Model to the November 17, 2004, Flood of Bull Creek Watershed, Austin, Texas

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/63099
    Collections
    • Journal of Hydrologic Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorHatim O. Sharif
    contributor authorLeon Sparks
    contributor authorAlmoutaz A. Hassan
    contributor authorJon Zeitler
    contributor authorHongjie Xie
    date accessioned2017-05-08T21:48:45Z
    date available2017-05-08T21:48:45Z
    date copyrightAugust 2010
    date issued2010
    identifier other%28asce%29he%2E1943-5584%2E0000249.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/63099
    description abstractThis study presents a hydrologic analysis of a flood event that took place over a small urbanizing watershed in Austin, Texas. The physically based, distributed-parameter gridded surface subsurface hydrologic analysis (GSSHA) hydrologic model was used to simulate the watershed response to a very high-intensity rain event. The hydrologic model was forced by both gauge-observed and multisensor precipitation estimator (MPE) rainfall input. Observed discharge was compared to GSSHA-generated hydrograph under various degrees of representation of the watershed physiography. In addition, simulation hydrographs by GSSHA using five different model grid sizes were compared in order to evaluate the effect of grid size on model predictions. The simulation hydrograph for the model using a 30-m grid cell generally compared well to the observed flow data once the effects of storm water detention were simulated. The comparison of simulation results from models using 30, 60, 90, 120, and 150 m grid size highlighted the loss of accuracy as the model grid size is increased. Driving the hydrologic model by data from the two rain gauges existing on the watershed resulted in significant overestimation of the runoff.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleApplication of a Distributed Hydrologic Model to the November 17, 2004, Flood of Bull Creek Watershed, Austin, Texas
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume15
    journal issue8
    journal titleJournal of Hydrologic Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000228
    treeJournal of Hydrologic Engineering:;2010:;Volume ( 015 ):;issue: 008
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian