YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Beam on Nonlinear Winkler Foundation and Modified Neutral Plane Solution for Calculating Downdrag Settlement

    Source: Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering:;2013:;Volume ( 139 ):;issue: 009
    Author:
    Rui
    ,
    Wang
    ,
    Scott J.
    ,
    Brandenberg
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000888
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: The neutral plane solution has been widely used to estimate downdrag settlements and drag loads mobilized in piles in consolidating soil profiles. Pile settlement is typically assumed equal to soil settlement at the neutral plane depth corresponding to effective stress conditions at the end of consolidation. This paper demonstrates that, in general, pile settlement is not equal to soil settlement at the neutral plane depth; rather, it is the relative velocity between the pile and soil that is zero at the neutral plane depth. A beam on nonlinear Winkler foundation (BNWF) solution, in which the shaft friction capacity is proportional to effective stress, is utilized to demonstrate that pile settlement is not equal to soil settlement at the neutral plane depth, because the neutral plane depth evolves as consolidation progresses. The BNWF solution also shows that pile settlement depends on drainage conditions, with more settlement occurring when consolidation occurs first near the top of the consolidating soil layer, and less settlement occurring when consolidation initiates at the bottom. A modified neutral plane solution that is amenable to hand calculation is formulated to account for the evolution of neutral plane depth on pile settlement. Finally, the proposed BNWF and modified neutral plane solutions are compared with measurements of downdrag settlement from a centrifuge test program. The proposed methods produced more accurate estimates of pile settlement than the traditional neutral plane solution.
    • Download: (955.0Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Beam on Nonlinear Winkler Foundation and Modified Neutral Plane Solution for Calculating Downdrag Settlement

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/62707
    Collections
    • Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorRui
    contributor authorWang
    contributor authorScott J.
    contributor authorBrandenberg
    date accessioned2017-05-08T21:48:00Z
    date available2017-05-08T21:48:00Z
    date copyrightSeptember 2013
    date issued2013
    identifier other%28asce%29gt%2E1943-5606%2E0000905.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/62707
    description abstractThe neutral plane solution has been widely used to estimate downdrag settlements and drag loads mobilized in piles in consolidating soil profiles. Pile settlement is typically assumed equal to soil settlement at the neutral plane depth corresponding to effective stress conditions at the end of consolidation. This paper demonstrates that, in general, pile settlement is not equal to soil settlement at the neutral plane depth; rather, it is the relative velocity between the pile and soil that is zero at the neutral plane depth. A beam on nonlinear Winkler foundation (BNWF) solution, in which the shaft friction capacity is proportional to effective stress, is utilized to demonstrate that pile settlement is not equal to soil settlement at the neutral plane depth, because the neutral plane depth evolves as consolidation progresses. The BNWF solution also shows that pile settlement depends on drainage conditions, with more settlement occurring when consolidation occurs first near the top of the consolidating soil layer, and less settlement occurring when consolidation initiates at the bottom. A modified neutral plane solution that is amenable to hand calculation is formulated to account for the evolution of neutral plane depth on pile settlement. Finally, the proposed BNWF and modified neutral plane solutions are compared with measurements of downdrag settlement from a centrifuge test program. The proposed methods produced more accurate estimates of pile settlement than the traditional neutral plane solution.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleBeam on Nonlinear Winkler Foundation and Modified Neutral Plane Solution for Calculating Downdrag Settlement
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume139
    journal issue9
    journal titleJournal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000888
    treeJournal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering:;2013:;Volume ( 139 ):;issue: 009
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian