YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Engineering Mechanics
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Engineering Mechanics
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Aerodynamic Mitigation of Roof and Wall Corner Suctions Using Simple Architectural Elements

    Source: Journal of Engineering Mechanics:;2013:;Volume ( 139 ):;issue: 003
    Author:
    Girma T.
    ,
    Bitsuamlak
    ,
    Workamaw
    ,
    Warsido
    ,
    Edward
    ,
    Ledesma
    ,
    Arindam Gan
    ,
    Chowdhury
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000505
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: This paper presents the use of simple architectural elements such as aerodynamic mitigation devices for reducing high wind-induced suctions occurring at roof and wall corners of low-rise buildings where wind-induced building envelope failures usually initiate. The architectural elements considered in the current study include trellises (pergolas), roof extensions of gable ends (gable end ribs), ridgeline extensions (ridge rib), and sideways extensions of walls (wall ribs). A small-scale model of residential villa was tested in a boundary layer wind tunnel for two different roof geometries (gable and hip). Moreover, selected cases were investigated at the Wall of Wind, a large-scale testing facility, to investigate scale effects. The effectiveness of these architectural elements in reducing high suction (negative pressure) was assessed by comparing the wind-induced pressure measurements obtained before and after introducing the elements. Based on the results obtained for the worst wind angle of attacks, the peak suction was reduced after introducing the architectural elements by 65% at gable-end corners, 60% close to roof ridges, 45% at soffits, 35% at wall corners, and 25% at eaves. These simple architectural elements, which can be retrofitted to the stock of existing homes or incorporated into the design of new buildings, can be used as aerodynamic mitigation devices for reducing peak suction at critical locations of the building envelope.
    • Download: (2.387Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Aerodynamic Mitigation of Roof and Wall Corner Suctions Using Simple Architectural Elements

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/60990
    Collections
    • Journal of Engineering Mechanics

    Show full item record

    contributor authorGirma T.
    contributor authorBitsuamlak
    contributor authorWorkamaw
    contributor authorWarsido
    contributor authorEdward
    contributor authorLedesma
    contributor authorArindam Gan
    contributor authorChowdhury
    date accessioned2017-05-08T21:44:00Z
    date available2017-05-08T21:44:00Z
    date copyrightMarch 2013
    date issued2013
    identifier other%28asce%29em%2E1943-7889%2E0000514.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/60990
    description abstractThis paper presents the use of simple architectural elements such as aerodynamic mitigation devices for reducing high wind-induced suctions occurring at roof and wall corners of low-rise buildings where wind-induced building envelope failures usually initiate. The architectural elements considered in the current study include trellises (pergolas), roof extensions of gable ends (gable end ribs), ridgeline extensions (ridge rib), and sideways extensions of walls (wall ribs). A small-scale model of residential villa was tested in a boundary layer wind tunnel for two different roof geometries (gable and hip). Moreover, selected cases were investigated at the Wall of Wind, a large-scale testing facility, to investigate scale effects. The effectiveness of these architectural elements in reducing high suction (negative pressure) was assessed by comparing the wind-induced pressure measurements obtained before and after introducing the elements. Based on the results obtained for the worst wind angle of attacks, the peak suction was reduced after introducing the architectural elements by 65% at gable-end corners, 60% close to roof ridges, 45% at soffits, 35% at wall corners, and 25% at eaves. These simple architectural elements, which can be retrofitted to the stock of existing homes or incorporated into the design of new buildings, can be used as aerodynamic mitigation devices for reducing peak suction at critical locations of the building envelope.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleAerodynamic Mitigation of Roof and Wall Corner Suctions Using Simple Architectural Elements
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume139
    journal issue3
    journal titleJournal of Engineering Mechanics
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000505
    treeJournal of Engineering Mechanics:;2013:;Volume ( 139 ):;issue: 003
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian