YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Environmental Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Environmental Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Biological Activated Carbon Treatment for Removing BTEX from Groundwater

    Source: Journal of Environmental Engineering:;2013:;Volume ( 139 ):;issue: 010
    Author:
    Wei Zhang
    ,
    Weijie Ding
    ,
    Weichi Ying
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0000731
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: Benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylenes (BTEX) are common groundwater pollutants. Biological activated carbon (BAC) treatment is attractive because BTEX species are well-adsorbed on activated carbon and also easily biodegraded in the adsorber. The inoculated activated carbon columns quickly became BAC systems; they removed most of the BTEX species present in the feed. Biodegradation was primarily responsible for the overall removal of the BAC systems, and the amounts of benzene, toluene, and o-xylene removed during the 2-week treatment period were all more than their respective isotherm capacities; 1,486, 1,463, 1,537, and 1,719 mg of benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and o-xylene were removed in the 2.5-g BAC systems versus the available adsorptive capacities of 174, 731, 1,515, and 895 mg, respectively. The stable BAC systems were resistant to the shock loadings of higher flow and concentration and consumed less than the expected amount of dissolved oxygen. Bioregeneration enabled the long-term treatment capability of the BAC systems for removing BTEX and other pollutants without periodic carbon replacement. The coal-based activated carbon (SC) was more desirable than the coconut-based activated carbon (YK) because of its lower cost and higher degree of bioregeneration.
    • Download: (1.195Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Biological Activated Carbon Treatment for Removing BTEX from Groundwater

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/60186
    Collections
    • Journal of Environmental Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorWei Zhang
    contributor authorWeijie Ding
    contributor authorWeichi Ying
    date accessioned2017-05-08T21:42:36Z
    date available2017-05-08T21:42:36Z
    date copyrightOctober 2013
    date issued2013
    identifier other%28asce%29ee%2E1943-7870%2E0000739.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/60186
    description abstractBenzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylenes (BTEX) are common groundwater pollutants. Biological activated carbon (BAC) treatment is attractive because BTEX species are well-adsorbed on activated carbon and also easily biodegraded in the adsorber. The inoculated activated carbon columns quickly became BAC systems; they removed most of the BTEX species present in the feed. Biodegradation was primarily responsible for the overall removal of the BAC systems, and the amounts of benzene, toluene, and o-xylene removed during the 2-week treatment period were all more than their respective isotherm capacities; 1,486, 1,463, 1,537, and 1,719 mg of benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and o-xylene were removed in the 2.5-g BAC systems versus the available adsorptive capacities of 174, 731, 1,515, and 895 mg, respectively. The stable BAC systems were resistant to the shock loadings of higher flow and concentration and consumed less than the expected amount of dissolved oxygen. Bioregeneration enabled the long-term treatment capability of the BAC systems for removing BTEX and other pollutants without periodic carbon replacement. The coal-based activated carbon (SC) was more desirable than the coconut-based activated carbon (YK) because of its lower cost and higher degree of bioregeneration.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleBiological Activated Carbon Treatment for Removing BTEX from Groundwater
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume139
    journal issue10
    journal titleJournal of Environmental Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0000731
    treeJournal of Environmental Engineering:;2013:;Volume ( 139 ):;issue: 010
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian