YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Postoccupancy Energy Consumption Survey of Arizona’s LEED New Construction Population

    Source: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management:;2012:;Volume ( 138 ):;issue: 006
    Author:
    Dixon Oates
    ,
    Kenneth T. Sullivan
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000478
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: Existing literature has not provided conclusive performance results for green building energy efficiency. Existing studies produced debated conclusions and failed to represent a geographic concentration of structures from hot and dry climates. This technical paper examines 47% of Arizona’s 53 building Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design for New Construction (LEED NC) building population in an effort to determine if Arizona’s LEED NC buildings achieve expected energy performance, how they compare with the existing building population and whether either system or managerial variables demonstrate efficiency correlations. Data collection efforts were successful for all desired deliverables. Analysis of the LEED NC sample returned mixed results. On average, Arizona’s LEED NC medium energy intense (MEI) buildings performed better than the national average yet worse than buildings located in similar climates. Certain LEED NC MEI building types did demonstrate greater efficiencies than the corresponding Commercial Building Energy Consumption Survey population. Arizona’s high energy intense (HEI) structures performed considerably lower than national and similar climate averages. The LEED NC sample also underperformed both the design and baseline energy use simulations. Energy consumption correlation analysis returned very few statistically significant results. The study’s results demonstrate to industry practitioners and researchers that the LEED NC rating system’s energy strategies fail to meet modeled efficiencies, thereby highlighting a need for ongoing scrutiny and diligence when measuring sustainability and efficiency within Arizona’s built environment.
    • Download: (232.2Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Postoccupancy Energy Consumption Survey of Arizona’s LEED New Construction Population

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/58639
    Collections
    • Journal of Construction Engineering and Management

    Show full item record

    contributor authorDixon Oates
    contributor authorKenneth T. Sullivan
    date accessioned2017-05-08T21:39:38Z
    date available2017-05-08T21:39:38Z
    date copyrightJune 2012
    date issued2012
    identifier other%28asce%29co%2E1943-7862%2E0000484.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/58639
    description abstractExisting literature has not provided conclusive performance results for green building energy efficiency. Existing studies produced debated conclusions and failed to represent a geographic concentration of structures from hot and dry climates. This technical paper examines 47% of Arizona’s 53 building Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design for New Construction (LEED NC) building population in an effort to determine if Arizona’s LEED NC buildings achieve expected energy performance, how they compare with the existing building population and whether either system or managerial variables demonstrate efficiency correlations. Data collection efforts were successful for all desired deliverables. Analysis of the LEED NC sample returned mixed results. On average, Arizona’s LEED NC medium energy intense (MEI) buildings performed better than the national average yet worse than buildings located in similar climates. Certain LEED NC MEI building types did demonstrate greater efficiencies than the corresponding Commercial Building Energy Consumption Survey population. Arizona’s high energy intense (HEI) structures performed considerably lower than national and similar climate averages. The LEED NC sample also underperformed both the design and baseline energy use simulations. Energy consumption correlation analysis returned very few statistically significant results. The study’s results demonstrate to industry practitioners and researchers that the LEED NC rating system’s energy strategies fail to meet modeled efficiencies, thereby highlighting a need for ongoing scrutiny and diligence when measuring sustainability and efficiency within Arizona’s built environment.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titlePostoccupancy Energy Consumption Survey of Arizona’s LEED New Construction Population
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume138
    journal issue6
    journal titleJournal of Construction Engineering and Management
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000478
    treeJournal of Construction Engineering and Management:;2012:;Volume ( 138 ):;issue: 006
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian