Show simple item record

contributor authorKeith Townsend
contributor authorHelen Lingard
contributor authorLisa Bradley
contributor authorKerry Brown
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:39:34Z
date available2017-05-08T21:39:34Z
date copyrightMarch 2012
date issued2012
identifier other%28asce%29co%2E1943-7862%2E0000442.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/58598
description abstractThis paper extends the understanding of working-time changes and work-life balance (WLB) through analyzing a case study where a reduction in working hours designed to assist the workforce in balancing work and nonwork life was implemented. An alliance project in the Australian construction industry was established initially with a 5-day working week, a departure from the industry-standard 6-day week. However, a range of factors complicated the success of this initiative, and the industry-standard 6-day working week was reinstated for the project. The authors argue that this case is valuable in determining the complex mix of influences that work against a wholesale or straightforward adoption of working-time adjustments and work-life balance practices. It is concluded that although the prevailing workplace culture is considered an important factor in the determination of working time, structural and workplace principles and practices may also be critical in working to secure the successful introduction of working-time reduction and work-life balance initiatives in the construction industry in the future.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleComplicated Working Time Arrangements: Construction Industry Case Study
typeJournal Paper
journal volume138
journal issue3
journal titleJournal of Construction Engineering and Management
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000436
treeJournal of Construction Engineering and Management:;2012:;Volume ( 138 ):;issue: 003
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record