| contributor author | Scott D. Porter | |
| contributor author | J. Logan Julander | |
| contributor author | Marvin W. Halling | |
| contributor author | Paul J. Barr | |
| date accessioned | 2017-05-08T21:37:33Z | |
| date available | 2017-05-08T21:37:33Z | |
| date copyright | August 2012 | |
| date issued | 2012 | |
| identifier other | %28asce%29cf%2E1943-5509%2E0000241.pdf | |
| identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/57831 | |
| description abstract | Precast deck panels are increasingly being used to reduce construction times as part of a push for accelerated bridge construction by some state departments of transportation. Despite the short-term benefits, the connections between panels have a history of serviceability problems. To evaluate the service and ultimate behavior of current and newly proposed connections, 12 push-off tests were performed on precast bridge deck transverse connections for shear. These tests used an improved shear specimen geometry that allowed the connection to deform in more realistic shear. This new test setup included spaces that allowed diagonal cracks to form and reinforcement to pull out of the connection. The push-off tests established the cracking and ultimate shear strengths of each connection detail. These details included a welded connection, an unreinforced grouted connection, and a post-tensioned-type connection tested with and without an applied compression force. Results of each detail type are compared. The test results show that the post-tensioned connection outperformed the other connection details, with 2.1 times the shear capacity of a welded connection spaced at 45.7 cm (18 in.). | |
| publisher | American Society of Civil Engineers | |
| title | Shear Testing of Precast Bridge Deck Panel Transverse Connections | |
| type | Journal Paper | |
| journal volume | 26 | |
| journal issue | 4 | |
| journal title | Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities | |
| identifier doi | 10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000238 | |
| tree | Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities:;2012:;Volume ( 026 ):;issue: 004 | |
| contenttype | Fulltext | |