| contributor author | Michael C. Ircha | |
| contributor author | James M. Tolliver | |
| date accessioned | 2017-05-08T21:32:56Z | |
| date available | 2017-05-08T21:32:56Z | |
| date copyright | April 1989 | |
| date issued | 1989 | |
| identifier other | %28asce%299742-597x%281989%295%3A2%28164%29.pdf | |
| identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/55725 | |
| description abstract | Restructuring is often used as a means of dealing with uncertainty in an organization's production, processes, or operating environment. Consequently, academics and consultants frequently recommend that bureaucracies adopt more “open” organizations to effectively cope with unpredictable conditions. Although moving to a more “open” structure reflects one course of action, alternatives exist; this paper outlines several restructuring alternatives such as risk analysis, environmental scanning, production and demand‐management. It also examines some hidden costs of restructuring. The conclusion is that restructuring is only one of a variety of organizational tools a manager may use to control uncertainty. | |
| publisher | American Society of Civil Engineers | |
| title | Restructuring Organizations: Alternatives and Costs | |
| type | Journal Paper | |
| journal volume | 5 | |
| journal issue | 2 | |
| journal title | Journal of Management in Engineering | |
| identifier doi | 10.1061/(ASCE)9742-597X(1989)5:2(164) | |
| tree | Journal of Management in Engineering:;1989:;Volume ( 005 ):;issue: 002 | |
| contenttype | Fulltext | |