Show simple item record

contributor authorGordon Culp
contributor authorAnne Smith
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:32:35Z
date available2017-05-08T21:32:35Z
date copyrightApril 2009
date issued2009
identifier other%28asce%291532-6748%282009%299%3A2%2865%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/55501
description abstractMyers-Briggs Type Indicator results from 740 professional employees of consulting engineering firms show that a greater percentage of consulting engineers have a Type preference for Introversion over Extraversion, Intuition over Sensing, Thinking over Feeling, and Judging over Perceiving than the national U.S. population. Substantially more consulting engineers have a Intuition-Thinking temperament than the national U.S. population. The differences in Type and temperament between consulting engineers, their clients, and the public can create communication challenges. The full range of Type and temperament preferences are of value in the diverse mix of work and related interactions with clients and the public inherent in the consulting engineering field. However 96 percent of individuals with Extraversion and Feeling preferences who enroll in engineering transfer to other fields in the first two years of college. Adjusting the first-year curricula so that individuals can see the value of their Feeling and Extraversion preferences in the world of consulting could lead to a more balanced mix of Types and temperaments within the pool of graduate engineers that can be drawn upon by consulting engineering firms.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleConsulting Engineers: Myers-Briggs Type and Temperament Preferences
typeJournal Paper
journal volume9
journal issue2
journal titleLeadership and Management in Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)1532-6748(2009)9:2(65)
treeLeadership and Management in Engineering:;2009:;Volume ( 009 ):;issue: 002
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record