YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Practice Periodical of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste Management
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Practice Periodical of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste Management
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Design, Construction, and Operation of Tailored Permeable Reactive Barriers

    Source: Practice Periodical of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste Management:;2003:;Volume ( 007 ):;issue: 004
    Author:
    Volker Birke
    ,
    Harald Burmeier
    ,
    Diana Rosenau
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-025X(2003)7:4(264)
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: In Germany, nine permeable reactive barriers (PRBs) for passive in situ remediation of contaminated groundwater have been erected over the last 3 to 4 years (in Bernau, built 2001; Bitterfeld, 1999; Denkendorf, 2000; Edenkoben, 1998 and 2001; Karlsruhe, 2000; Oberursel, 2002; Reichenbach, 2000; Rheine, 1998; and Tübingen, 1998), all revealing interesting design and engineering features. At the Edenkoben site, one can find what is probably one of today’s largest funnel-and-gate (F&G) systems (approximately 450 m long, equipped with six gates). This paper provides an introduction to German PRB projects, focusing on design and engineering features as well as on some major first outcomes regarding contaminant destruction efficiency and long-term performance, where available. It shows the prevalence of F&G and related systems, which are, predominantly equipped with specially positioned or designed funnels and/or gates (for example, relatively flat gates installed close below ground level, or reactors receiving passively or even actively diverted or lifted groundwater). Different zero valent iron types or activated carbon are the reactive materials exclusively applied in German PRBs to treat chlorinated volatile organic carbons and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), though a biological treatment zone to degrade PAHs is planned to be set up at Offenbach, and different alternative innovative materials are currently being tested in a semitechnical scope at Bitterfeld and elsewhere.
    • Download: (3.258Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Design, Construction, and Operation of Tailored Permeable Reactive Barriers

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/53740
    Collections
    • Practice Periodical of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste Management

    Show full item record

    contributor authorVolker Birke
    contributor authorHarald Burmeier
    contributor authorDiana Rosenau
    date accessioned2017-05-08T21:29:53Z
    date available2017-05-08T21:29:53Z
    date copyrightOctober 2003
    date issued2003
    identifier other%28asce%291090-025x%282003%297%3A4%28264%29.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/53740
    description abstractIn Germany, nine permeable reactive barriers (PRBs) for passive in situ remediation of contaminated groundwater have been erected over the last 3 to 4 years (in Bernau, built 2001; Bitterfeld, 1999; Denkendorf, 2000; Edenkoben, 1998 and 2001; Karlsruhe, 2000; Oberursel, 2002; Reichenbach, 2000; Rheine, 1998; and Tübingen, 1998), all revealing interesting design and engineering features. At the Edenkoben site, one can find what is probably one of today’s largest funnel-and-gate (F&G) systems (approximately 450 m long, equipped with six gates). This paper provides an introduction to German PRB projects, focusing on design and engineering features as well as on some major first outcomes regarding contaminant destruction efficiency and long-term performance, where available. It shows the prevalence of F&G and related systems, which are, predominantly equipped with specially positioned or designed funnels and/or gates (for example, relatively flat gates installed close below ground level, or reactors receiving passively or even actively diverted or lifted groundwater). Different zero valent iron types or activated carbon are the reactive materials exclusively applied in German PRBs to treat chlorinated volatile organic carbons and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), though a biological treatment zone to degrade PAHs is planned to be set up at Offenbach, and different alternative innovative materials are currently being tested in a semitechnical scope at Bitterfeld and elsewhere.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleDesign, Construction, and Operation of Tailored Permeable Reactive Barriers
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume7
    journal issue4
    journal titlePractice Periodical of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste Management
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)1090-025X(2003)7:4(264)
    treePractice Periodical of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste Management:;2003:;Volume ( 007 ):;issue: 004
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian