YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Continuous Hydrologic Modeling Study with the Hydrologic Modeling System

    Source: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering:;2004:;Volume ( 009 ):;issue: 003
    Author:
    Matt Fleming
    ,
    Vincent Neary
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2004)9:3(175)
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: The development of model parametrization methodologies using geographic information systems is becoming increasingly important in hydrologic modeling applications, especially given the continued trend of comprehensive and readily available geospatial databases. This paper discusses the development of parametrization and calibration methodologies for the 12-parameter soil moisture accounting (SMA) algorithm recently added to the Hydrologic Modeling System (HMS) program by the Hydrologic Engineering Center (HEC). The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Nashville District, is considering HMS as a tool for continuous hydrologic simulation in the Cumberland River basin. The study demonstrates that parameters for a complex soil moisture accounting model can be derived from publicly available geographic information system (GIS) databases and that the use of seasonal or multiparameter sets improves model performance. Only one of the seven parameters estimated using GIS databases was varied during model calibration. Parameter values after model calibration, including four parameters estimated using historic streamflow records, deviated from estimated values by an average of 37%. Model performance indicates that the developed parametrization and calibration methodologies work well when applied to the test watershed and should be applicable to other watersheds in the Cumberland River basin.
    • Download: (527.7Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Continuous Hydrologic Modeling Study with the Hydrologic Modeling System

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/49774
    Collections
    • Journal of Hydrologic Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorMatt Fleming
    contributor authorVincent Neary
    date accessioned2017-05-08T21:23:44Z
    date available2017-05-08T21:23:44Z
    date copyrightMay 2004
    date issued2004
    identifier other%28asce%291084-0699%282004%299%3A3%28175%29.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/49774
    description abstractThe development of model parametrization methodologies using geographic information systems is becoming increasingly important in hydrologic modeling applications, especially given the continued trend of comprehensive and readily available geospatial databases. This paper discusses the development of parametrization and calibration methodologies for the 12-parameter soil moisture accounting (SMA) algorithm recently added to the Hydrologic Modeling System (HMS) program by the Hydrologic Engineering Center (HEC). The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Nashville District, is considering HMS as a tool for continuous hydrologic simulation in the Cumberland River basin. The study demonstrates that parameters for a complex soil moisture accounting model can be derived from publicly available geographic information system (GIS) databases and that the use of seasonal or multiparameter sets improves model performance. Only one of the seven parameters estimated using GIS databases was varied during model calibration. Parameter values after model calibration, including four parameters estimated using historic streamflow records, deviated from estimated values by an average of 37%. Model performance indicates that the developed parametrization and calibration methodologies work well when applied to the test watershed and should be applicable to other watersheds in the Cumberland River basin.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleContinuous Hydrologic Modeling Study with the Hydrologic Modeling System
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume9
    journal issue3
    journal titleJournal of Hydrologic Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2004)9:3(175)
    treeJournal of Hydrologic Engineering:;2004:;Volume ( 009 ):;issue: 003
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian