YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Infrastructure Systems
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Infrastructure Systems
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Resource Allocation for Army Installation Management

    Source: Journal of Infrastructure Systems:;1997:;Volume ( 003 ):;issue: 004
    Author:
    Elizabeth A. Lind
    ,
    John V. Farr
    ,
    James L. Kays
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(1997)3:4(177)
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: Given the recent decreases in the defense budget, unfunded contingency operations, aging military infrastructure, and restationing of overseas troops to within the continental United States, military commanders must make informed and difficult decisions with regard to operating military installations and maintaining infrastructure. Unfortunately, these commanders often must trade off infrastructure and quality of life to support training, readiness, and the actual conduct of military operations because of limited funding. In a partial response to this situation, the Army developed the Installation Status Report (ISR) to articulate to Office of the Secretary of Defense and Congress the current condition of the infrastructure of military bases and costs to sustain and upgrade them to an acceptable standard. As a continuation of the ISR effort, the Installation Decision Support Model (IDSM) was developed as an installation-level budgeting priority tool. The IDSM uses data from the Army's ISR, the commander's priorities, and funding strategies as input to produce database viewing and editing capabilities, a map display of conditions, guidance from the commander in developing projects, funding strategies and comparisons, and an after-action report on the effectiveness of last year's budget. This paper summarizes the IDSM from a total-systems perspective and presents the methodology used in the capital budgeting process.
    • Download: (787.3Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Resource Allocation for Army Installation Management

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/48055
    Collections
    • Journal of Infrastructure Systems

    Show full item record

    contributor authorElizabeth A. Lind
    contributor authorJohn V. Farr
    contributor authorJames L. Kays
    date accessioned2017-05-08T21:21:05Z
    date available2017-05-08T21:21:05Z
    date copyrightDecember 1997
    date issued1997
    identifier other%28asce%291076-0342%281997%293%3A4%28177%29.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/48055
    description abstractGiven the recent decreases in the defense budget, unfunded contingency operations, aging military infrastructure, and restationing of overseas troops to within the continental United States, military commanders must make informed and difficult decisions with regard to operating military installations and maintaining infrastructure. Unfortunately, these commanders often must trade off infrastructure and quality of life to support training, readiness, and the actual conduct of military operations because of limited funding. In a partial response to this situation, the Army developed the Installation Status Report (ISR) to articulate to Office of the Secretary of Defense and Congress the current condition of the infrastructure of military bases and costs to sustain and upgrade them to an acceptable standard. As a continuation of the ISR effort, the Installation Decision Support Model (IDSM) was developed as an installation-level budgeting priority tool. The IDSM uses data from the Army's ISR, the commander's priorities, and funding strategies as input to produce database viewing and editing capabilities, a map display of conditions, guidance from the commander in developing projects, funding strategies and comparisons, and an after-action report on the effectiveness of last year's budget. This paper summarizes the IDSM from a total-systems perspective and presents the methodology used in the capital budgeting process.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleResource Allocation for Army Installation Management
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume3
    journal issue4
    journal titleJournal of Infrastructure Systems
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(1997)3:4(177)
    treeJournal of Infrastructure Systems:;1997:;Volume ( 003 ):;issue: 004
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian