YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Infrastructure Systems
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Infrastructure Systems
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Statewide Programming: Implementing Transportation-Policy Objectives

    Source: Journal of Infrastructure Systems:;1996:;Volume ( 002 ):;issue: 001
    Author:
    Debbie A. Niemeier
    ,
    Tracy L. Reed
    ,
    G. Scott Rutherford
    ,
    Pat Morin
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(1996)2:1(30)
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: This paper reviews several prominent state of the practice prioritization methods, describes the ranking methodology for highway mobility improvements used by the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT), and presents empirical results. The new mobility prioritization methodology constitutes a flexible, inclusive framework for assessing independent projects relating to all highway modes and responding directly to state policy goals. It uses a mathematical ranking algorithm to determine the optimal priority order of projects for programming on the basis of cost-efficiency, degree of community support, environmental impacts, mode integration, and land-use-plan compatibility. Because dollar values cannot be assigned to a full range of quantifiable criteria, the project benefit cost ratios are supplemented by the other four categories of risk criteria with disparate unit measures. Based on the first year of implementation, a strict adherence to priority order using the WSDOT prioritization method results in a slightly lower overall program cost-efficiency than might otherwise be achieved by optimizing the program's net present value. The overall effect is minor, but the nonmonetary criteria do improve the priority order of several projects while lowering the rankings of other projects. From a practical standpoint, the methodology is a tool for selecting a subset of highway mobility projects that provides increased knowledge of investment trade-offs given the budget constraints.
    • Download: (1.407Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Statewide Programming: Implementing Transportation-Policy Objectives

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/48010
    Collections
    • Journal of Infrastructure Systems

    Show full item record

    contributor authorDebbie A. Niemeier
    contributor authorTracy L. Reed
    contributor authorG. Scott Rutherford
    contributor authorPat Morin
    date accessioned2017-05-08T21:21:02Z
    date available2017-05-08T21:21:02Z
    date copyrightMarch 1996
    date issued1996
    identifier other%28asce%291076-0342%281996%292%3A1%2830%29.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/48010
    description abstractThis paper reviews several prominent state of the practice prioritization methods, describes the ranking methodology for highway mobility improvements used by the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT), and presents empirical results. The new mobility prioritization methodology constitutes a flexible, inclusive framework for assessing independent projects relating to all highway modes and responding directly to state policy goals. It uses a mathematical ranking algorithm to determine the optimal priority order of projects for programming on the basis of cost-efficiency, degree of community support, environmental impacts, mode integration, and land-use-plan compatibility. Because dollar values cannot be assigned to a full range of quantifiable criteria, the project benefit cost ratios are supplemented by the other four categories of risk criteria with disparate unit measures. Based on the first year of implementation, a strict adherence to priority order using the WSDOT prioritization method results in a slightly lower overall program cost-efficiency than might otherwise be achieved by optimizing the program's net present value. The overall effect is minor, but the nonmonetary criteria do improve the priority order of several projects while lowering the rankings of other projects. From a practical standpoint, the methodology is a tool for selecting a subset of highway mobility projects that provides increased knowledge of investment trade-offs given the budget constraints.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleStatewide Programming: Implementing Transportation-Policy Objectives
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume2
    journal issue1
    journal titleJournal of Infrastructure Systems
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(1996)2:1(30)
    treeJournal of Infrastructure Systems:;1996:;Volume ( 002 ):;issue: 001
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian