YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Infrastructure Systems
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Infrastructure Systems
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Managing Railway Fixed Plant

    Source: Journal of Infrastructure Systems:;1995:;Volume ( 001 ):;issue: 003
    Author:
    A. E. Fazio
    ,
    S. A. Matina
    ,
    R. N. Fazio
    ,
    G. A. Kelly
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(1995)1:3(172)
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: Engineers have experienced difficulty in applying standard project/construction management techniques (e.g., critical path method) to the reconstruction and maintenance of an operating railway. These problems are most acute with respect to work performed by company forces; however, they are encountered in contract construction, design, and developmental projects. Often this experience has led to the conclusion that standard methods are, in fact, inappropriate to the environment of an operating railway. The writers believe this conclusion to be erroneous. The problem lies in the misjudging of, or the inability to, define the problem. This in turn results in the improper application of a management method or in the application of an inappropriate method. The formation of commuter and regional rail agencies, which have a large public-funding basis and have initiated large rehabilitation projects, has sparked a renewed interest in utilizing the appropriate analytical techniques in managing railway engineering efforts. In this paper the primary railway engineering operations are reviewed and a formal categorization is made using a “project management matrix.” This matrix provides a formalism for “problem definition” that will assist engineers in selecting the proper analytical management techniques. Railway construction and design management operations are discussed but not analyzed, since they accommodate the traditional management techniques such as CPM and PERT, which are well covered elsewhere. Two particular operations (maintenance and production) that are not covered in other literature are discussed and evaluated on our management matrix.
    • Download: (794.7Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Managing Railway Fixed Plant

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/47997
    Collections
    • Journal of Infrastructure Systems

    Show full item record

    contributor authorA. E. Fazio
    contributor authorS. A. Matina
    contributor authorR. N. Fazio
    contributor authorG. A. Kelly
    date accessioned2017-05-08T21:21:01Z
    date available2017-05-08T21:21:01Z
    date copyrightSeptember 1995
    date issued1995
    identifier other%28asce%291076-0342%281995%291%3A3%28172%29.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/47997
    description abstractEngineers have experienced difficulty in applying standard project/construction management techniques (e.g., critical path method) to the reconstruction and maintenance of an operating railway. These problems are most acute with respect to work performed by company forces; however, they are encountered in contract construction, design, and developmental projects. Often this experience has led to the conclusion that standard methods are, in fact, inappropriate to the environment of an operating railway. The writers believe this conclusion to be erroneous. The problem lies in the misjudging of, or the inability to, define the problem. This in turn results in the improper application of a management method or in the application of an inappropriate method. The formation of commuter and regional rail agencies, which have a large public-funding basis and have initiated large rehabilitation projects, has sparked a renewed interest in utilizing the appropriate analytical techniques in managing railway engineering efforts. In this paper the primary railway engineering operations are reviewed and a formal categorization is made using a “project management matrix.” This matrix provides a formalism for “problem definition” that will assist engineers in selecting the proper analytical management techniques. Railway construction and design management operations are discussed but not analyzed, since they accommodate the traditional management techniques such as CPM and PERT, which are well covered elsewhere. Two particular operations (maintenance and production) that are not covered in other literature are discussed and evaluated on our management matrix.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleManaging Railway Fixed Plant
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume1
    journal issue3
    journal titleJournal of Infrastructure Systems
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(1995)1:3(172)
    treeJournal of Infrastructure Systems:;1995:;Volume ( 001 ):;issue: 003
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian