Show simple item record

contributor authorJames Trevelyan
contributor authorSabbia Tilli
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:20:50Z
date available2017-05-08T21:20:50Z
date copyrightOctober 2007
date issued2007
identifier other%28asce%291052-3928%282007%29133%3A4%28300%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/47877
description abstractEngineering literature mostly focuses on the “objects” and techniques that interest engineers: there are only a few accounts of the people that do engineering work and what that work actually involves. The relevant literature contributes a combination of personal opinion, anecdotal reports, and empirical evidence from quantitative and a few qualitative surveys. Most of the empirical research provides only indirect and limited evidence on engineering work as it is practiced because the survey questions seem to be based on preconceived notions of engineering work. Almost all the papers in the literature that refer to engineering practice aim to provide evidence for changing engineering education or evidence to support a particular set of engineering competencies. From these narrow objectives we can learn a little about engineering work. More empirical evidence is needed before we can work towards a comprehensive understanding, let alone improvement of engineering working methods and practices.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titlePublished Research on Engineering Work
typeJournal Paper
journal volume133
journal issue4
journal titleJournal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(2007)133:4(300)
treeJournal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice:;2007:;Volume ( 133 ):;issue: 004
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record