Utilizing Dispute Review Boards in Relational Contracting: A Case Study

Abstract

Disputes during construction projects are counterproductive to the progress of the project and they are not totally eliminated even when using relational contracting on projects. Using a dispute review board (DRB) during construction is one method that helps to resolve disputes on both public and private projects. This article discusses the advantages and disadvantages of utilizing DRB for relational contracts when disputes arise during construction. The issues discussed in this article include: defining DRBs; background information on dispute resolution methods; a description of a case study project; roles of the parties involved in the DRB; DRB member selection; causes of disputes; geotechnical design summary reports; DRB presentations by owners, contractors, construction managers, and subcontractors; and perspectives of the owner, contractor, and construction managers on the DRB process.