YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Argument against Separate Writing Courses for Engineers

    Source: Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice:;1996:;Volume ( 122 ):;issue: 003
    Author:
    Terry Clayton
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(1996)122:3(111)
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: Separate writing courses offered by language specialists without the benefit of collaboration from their engineering colleagues can do little to improve the ability of engineers to express themselves in writing. The most effective way of dealing with issues of human communication in engineering curriculums is to consciously and deliberately integrate these processes into ongoing engineering courses in collaboration with language specialists. Doing so virtually eliminates the universal timetabling problem of trying to find a slot for yet another course. Putting a focus on human communication in engineering classrooms promotes multidisciplinary interaction among people of diverse backgrounds with various kinds of knowledge and experience, a major objective of the new engineering curriculums.
    • Download: (517.5Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Argument against Separate Writing Courses for Engineers

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/47400
    Collections
    • Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice

    Show full item record

    contributor authorTerry Clayton
    date accessioned2017-05-08T21:20:06Z
    date available2017-05-08T21:20:06Z
    date copyrightJuly 1996
    date issued1996
    identifier other%28asce%291052-3928%281996%29122%3A3%28111%29.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/47400
    description abstractSeparate writing courses offered by language specialists without the benefit of collaboration from their engineering colleagues can do little to improve the ability of engineers to express themselves in writing. The most effective way of dealing with issues of human communication in engineering curriculums is to consciously and deliberately integrate these processes into ongoing engineering courses in collaboration with language specialists. Doing so virtually eliminates the universal timetabling problem of trying to find a slot for yet another course. Putting a focus on human communication in engineering classrooms promotes multidisciplinary interaction among people of diverse backgrounds with various kinds of knowledge and experience, a major objective of the new engineering curriculums.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleArgument against Separate Writing Courses for Engineers
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume122
    journal issue3
    journal titleJournal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(1996)122:3(111)
    treeJournal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice:;1996:;Volume ( 122 ):;issue: 003
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian