Meeting Professional Development Needs in Large Consulting FirmSource: Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice:;1993:;Volume ( 119 ):;issue: 004Author:James W. Poirot
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(1993)119:4(333)Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
Abstract: Knowledge expectations of civil engineers at a large consulting engineering firm extend beyond their technical specialties to include such areas as business, law, ethics, marketing, government policy, and information technology. Meeting these professional development expectations requires an ongoing commitment by the engineers themselves, the universities, and the consulting firm. Civil engineers must recognize two facts about their educational needs: There are limits to university curricula, and every engineer must commit to lifelong learning. The role of universities is to concentrate on core curricula while selectively broadening course content. There is no practical way for universities to provide curricula that are broad enough to meet the varied demands of a consulting engineering practice. Only continuing education can adequately supplement engineering degree programs. Practitioners can expand their involvement by assisting in existing courses and teaching additional courses. Consulting firms can help engineers broaden their knowledge and skills through on‐the‐job training, self education, and professional development programs. Responsibility for professional growth within the civil engineering community requires continuous improvement of university curricula and the perpetuation of lifelong learning.
|
Show full item record
| contributor author | James W. Poirot | |
| date accessioned | 2017-05-08T21:19:48Z | |
| date available | 2017-05-08T21:19:48Z | |
| date copyright | October 1993 | |
| date issued | 1993 | |
| identifier other | %28asce%291052-3928%281993%29119%3A4%28333%29.pdf | |
| identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/47229 | |
| description abstract | Knowledge expectations of civil engineers at a large consulting engineering firm extend beyond their technical specialties to include such areas as business, law, ethics, marketing, government policy, and information technology. Meeting these professional development expectations requires an ongoing commitment by the engineers themselves, the universities, and the consulting firm. Civil engineers must recognize two facts about their educational needs: There are limits to university curricula, and every engineer must commit to lifelong learning. The role of universities is to concentrate on core curricula while selectively broadening course content. There is no practical way for universities to provide curricula that are broad enough to meet the varied demands of a consulting engineering practice. Only continuing education can adequately supplement engineering degree programs. Practitioners can expand their involvement by assisting in existing courses and teaching additional courses. Consulting firms can help engineers broaden their knowledge and skills through on‐the‐job training, self education, and professional development programs. Responsibility for professional growth within the civil engineering community requires continuous improvement of university curricula and the perpetuation of lifelong learning. | |
| publisher | American Society of Civil Engineers | |
| title | Meeting Professional Development Needs in Large Consulting Firm | |
| type | Journal Paper | |
| journal volume | 119 | |
| journal issue | 4 | |
| journal title | Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice | |
| identifier doi | 10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(1993)119:4(333) | |
| tree | Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice:;1993:;Volume ( 119 ):;issue: 004 | |
| contenttype | Fulltext |