YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Commentary on Infrastructure Financing

    Source: Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering:;1986:;Volume ( 112 ):;issue: 001
    Author:
    John H. Wiedeman
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(1986)112:1(53)
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: Two viewpoints on infrastructure financing were expressed at a February 25, 1985 Congressional symposium. Congressman James J. Howard's Bill proposes the establishment of repayable grants to the states and territories based on population. According to this bill, states must establish an infrastructure revolving fund, and loan the funds to political subdivisions within the state. The funds could only be used for construction of water, wastewater and transportation facilities, including hard and soft construction costs. The states are prohibited from using these funds to match other federal funds or projects that would normally be carried out within 24 months of the date of the loan. Congressman William F. dinger, Jr. proposes the establishment of a National Public Works Corporation in which loans to states are financed by bonds issued with the credit of the Federal Government. The only information available on this program was provided by Congressman Clinger at the symposium. Supplying only 4% of the estimated infrastructure need, neither the Howard Bill nor the Clinger proposal will solve the infrastructure problem. However, the Howard Bill would provide a significant source of funding for projects not now fundable due to their inability to generate revenue. If subsidized by grant funds to lower interest rates in a time of crisis, the Clinger proposal could provide valuable insurance.
    • Download: (299.3Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Commentary on Infrastructure Financing

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/46702
    Collections
    • Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorJohn H. Wiedeman
    date accessioned2017-05-08T21:18:56Z
    date available2017-05-08T21:18:56Z
    date copyrightJanuary 1986
    date issued1986
    identifier other%28asce%291052-3928%281986%29112%3A1%2853%29.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/46702
    description abstractTwo viewpoints on infrastructure financing were expressed at a February 25, 1985 Congressional symposium. Congressman James J. Howard's Bill proposes the establishment of repayable grants to the states and territories based on population. According to this bill, states must establish an infrastructure revolving fund, and loan the funds to political subdivisions within the state. The funds could only be used for construction of water, wastewater and transportation facilities, including hard and soft construction costs. The states are prohibited from using these funds to match other federal funds or projects that would normally be carried out within 24 months of the date of the loan. Congressman William F. dinger, Jr. proposes the establishment of a National Public Works Corporation in which loans to states are financed by bonds issued with the credit of the Federal Government. The only information available on this program was provided by Congressman Clinger at the symposium. Supplying only 4% of the estimated infrastructure need, neither the Howard Bill nor the Clinger proposal will solve the infrastructure problem. However, the Howard Bill would provide a significant source of funding for projects not now fundable due to their inability to generate revenue. If subsidized by grant funds to lower interest rates in a time of crisis, the Clinger proposal could provide valuable insurance.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleCommentary on Infrastructure Financing
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume112
    journal issue1
    journal titleJournal of Professional Issues in Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(1986)112:1(53)
    treeJournal of Professional Issues in Engineering:;1986:;Volume ( 112 ):;issue: 001
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian