YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    The Civil Engineering Degree: Education or Training?

    Source: Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering:;1984:;Volume ( 110 ):;issue: 001
    Author:
    Kathleen A. Vild
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(1984)110:1(25)
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: The limitations of the current four‐year engineering curricula are examined, emphasizing the lack of liberal arts supplement to an undergraduate engineering education. While the importance of the engineering function in society is stressed, the increasing need for more policy conscious engineers is cited. In summary, it is suggested that the engineering degree be made a professional degree to be earned in graduate school after a liberal arts undergraduate education.
    • Download: (382.2Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      The Civil Engineering Degree: Education or Training?

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/46658
    Collections
    • Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorKathleen A. Vild
    date accessioned2017-05-08T21:18:51Z
    date available2017-05-08T21:18:51Z
    date copyrightJanuary 1984
    date issued1984
    identifier other%28asce%291052-3928%281984%29110%3A1%2825%29.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/46658
    description abstractThe limitations of the current four‐year engineering curricula are examined, emphasizing the lack of liberal arts supplement to an undergraduate engineering education. While the importance of the engineering function in society is stressed, the increasing need for more policy conscious engineers is cited. In summary, it is suggested that the engineering degree be made a professional degree to be earned in graduate school after a liberal arts undergraduate education.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleThe Civil Engineering Degree: Education or Training?
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume110
    journal issue1
    journal titleJournal of Professional Issues in Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(1984)110:1(25)
    treeJournal of Professional Issues in Engineering:;1984:;Volume ( 110 ):;issue: 001
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian