Concept of “Care” in EngineeringSource: Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities:;2005:;Volume ( 019 ):;issue: 003Author:Joshua B. Kardon
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(2005)19:3(256)Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
Abstract: If the performance of a constructed facility fails to conform with what is intended or anticipated, the engineer-of-record for the facility can be charged with negligence and may bear the liability for damages arising from that failure. An engineer’s negligence is assessed by measuring the engineer’s actions relative to the “standard of care” of the profession. This paper briefly describes the meaning and application of the standard of care, and addresses the question, “What is ‘care’ with regard to engineering?” To examine that question, the paper introduces the five elements of the ethic of care as defined by Joan Tronto: attentiveness, responsibility, competence, responsiveness, and integrity, and builds on work by Marina Pantazidou and Indira Nair that identified care as an ethical framework suitable to provide guidance for engineering activities. The paper explores the applicability of the ethic of care to engineering practice by examining how the elements relate to the performance of engineers described in published case studies of engineering failures. The standard of care question raised in each case study is evaluated within the ethic of care framework, and an assessment is made of the engineer’s exercise of the elements of the ethic of care.
|
Collections
Show full item record
| contributor author | Joshua B. Kardon | |
| date accessioned | 2017-05-08T21:15:08Z | |
| date available | 2017-05-08T21:15:08Z | |
| date copyright | August 2005 | |
| date issued | 2005 | |
| identifier other | %28asce%290887-3828%282005%2919%3A3%28256%29.pdf | |
| identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/44395 | |
| description abstract | If the performance of a constructed facility fails to conform with what is intended or anticipated, the engineer-of-record for the facility can be charged with negligence and may bear the liability for damages arising from that failure. An engineer’s negligence is assessed by measuring the engineer’s actions relative to the “standard of care” of the profession. This paper briefly describes the meaning and application of the standard of care, and addresses the question, “What is ‘care’ with regard to engineering?” To examine that question, the paper introduces the five elements of the ethic of care as defined by Joan Tronto: attentiveness, responsibility, competence, responsiveness, and integrity, and builds on work by Marina Pantazidou and Indira Nair that identified care as an ethical framework suitable to provide guidance for engineering activities. The paper explores the applicability of the ethic of care to engineering practice by examining how the elements relate to the performance of engineers described in published case studies of engineering failures. The standard of care question raised in each case study is evaluated within the ethic of care framework, and an assessment is made of the engineer’s exercise of the elements of the ethic of care. | |
| publisher | American Society of Civil Engineers | |
| title | Concept of “Care” in Engineering | |
| type | Journal Paper | |
| journal volume | 19 | |
| journal issue | 3 | |
| journal title | Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities | |
| identifier doi | 10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(2005)19:3(256) | |
| tree | Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities:;2005:;Volume ( 019 ):;issue: 003 | |
| contenttype | Fulltext |