Show simple item record

contributor authorJohn P. Gnaedinger
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:14:13Z
date available2017-05-08T21:14:13Z
date copyrightAugust 1987
date issued1987
identifier other%28asce%290887-3828%281987%291%3A3%28150%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/43833
description abstractInterest in alternative dispute resolution (ADR) techniques for the construction industry has grown in recent years. Traditional litigation has been criticized on several fronts. The traditional procedures are often cumbersome, expensive, and lengthy. The outcome of litigation is uncertain and often confusing. For certain cases, alternative procedures may be useful in quickly resolving disputes. Sometimes there is no alternative to litigation. Each case is unique, and the appropriate form of dispute resolution mechanism must be established for each project. This paper reviews the process of mediation/arbitration, and compares that process to other alternative dispute resolution procedures.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleMediation/Arbitration: Alternative Dispute Resolution Process
typeJournal Paper
journal volume1
journal issue3
journal titleJournal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(1987)1:3(150)
treeJournal of Performance of Constructed Facilities:;1987:;Volume ( 001 ):;issue: 003
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record