YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Deciphering the “Art” in Modeling and Simulation of the Knee Joint: Model Benchmarking

    Source: Journal of Biomechanical Engineering:;2026:;volume( 148 ):;issue:005::page 452
    Author:
    Nazem, Maryam
    ,
    Andreassen, Thor E.
    ,
    Kim, Nancy
    ,
    Moyle, Kate
    ,
    Besier, Thor F.
    ,
    Halloran, Jason P.
    ,
    Imhauser, Carl W.
    ,
    Chokhandre, Snehal
    ,
    Schneider, Marco T. Y.
    ,
    Elmasry, Shady
    ,
    Zaylor, William
    ,
    Shelburne, Kevin B.
    ,
    Erdemir, Ahmet
    ,
    Laz, Peter J.
    DOI: 10.1115/1.4070823
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: Abstract. Given the strong ties to data sharing and the responsible use of resources, reproducibility of modeling and simulation practice is of paramount importance in science. Computational models in orthopedics provide insight into healthy and injured joint mechanics and can inform clinical decision-making. The KneeHub project investigated the influence of modelers' decisions and thus their “art” in simulation and modeling; five teams developed and calibrated knee models using the same experimental data. Model benchmarking evaluated the predictive ability of the models under loading scenarios that were not considered in the development and calibration process. The objective of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of predictions of knee-specific joint biomechanics for benchmark scenarios of simulating a resected anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) using models of one knee and a combined pivot shift loading using models of another knee. The models predicted the major trends in kinematics and kinetics; however, differences were observed in comparison to experimental data and between teams. Model-to-experiment root-mean-square (RMS) errors were up to 6.6±2.4 mm in anterior–posterior (AP) translation, 13.5±12.9 deg in internal–external (IE) rotation, and 5.3±3.4 deg in varus–valgus (VV) rotation; errors were largest in internal–external rotation, and standard deviations reflected differences between teams. While calibrated models were tuned to a similar set of conditions (albeit with different decisions), the optimized stiffness and reference length/strain of ligament structures may not fully reproduce the contributions of these structures to joint kinematics that were measured experimentally in the benchmark scenarios. As researchers often extend models beyond the conditions used to calibrate them, quantifying model accuracy and limitations with benchmarking represents a crucial step toward reproducibility and can help establish best practices for credible modeling in our community.
    • Download: (1.328Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Deciphering the “Art” in Modeling and Simulation of the Knee Joint: Model Benchmarking

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4316759
    Collections
    • Journal of Biomechanical Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorNazem, Maryam
    contributor authorAndreassen, Thor E.
    contributor authorKim, Nancy
    contributor authorMoyle, Kate
    contributor authorBesier, Thor F.
    contributor authorHalloran, Jason P.
    contributor authorImhauser, Carl W.
    contributor authorChokhandre, Snehal
    contributor authorSchneider, Marco T. Y.
    contributor authorElmasry, Shady
    contributor authorZaylor, William
    contributor authorShelburne, Kevin B.
    contributor authorErdemir, Ahmet
    contributor authorLaz, Peter J.
    date accessioned2026-08-23T08:34:45Z
    date available2026-08-23T08:34:45Z
    date copyright2026/05/01
    date issued2026
    identifier issn0148-0731
    identifier otherbio-25-1200.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4316759
    description abstractAbstract. Given the strong ties to data sharing and the responsible use of resources, reproducibility of modeling and simulation practice is of paramount importance in science. Computational models in orthopedics provide insight into healthy and injured joint mechanics and can inform clinical decision-making. The KneeHub project investigated the influence of modelers' decisions and thus their “art” in simulation and modeling; five teams developed and calibrated knee models using the same experimental data. Model benchmarking evaluated the predictive ability of the models under loading scenarios that were not considered in the development and calibration process. The objective of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of predictions of knee-specific joint biomechanics for benchmark scenarios of simulating a resected anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) using models of one knee and a combined pivot shift loading using models of another knee. The models predicted the major trends in kinematics and kinetics; however, differences were observed in comparison to experimental data and between teams. Model-to-experiment root-mean-square (RMS) errors were up to 6.6±2.4 mm in anterior–posterior (AP) translation, 13.5±12.9 deg in internal–external (IE) rotation, and 5.3±3.4 deg in varus–valgus (VV) rotation; errors were largest in internal–external rotation, and standard deviations reflected differences between teams. While calibrated models were tuned to a similar set of conditions (albeit with different decisions), the optimized stiffness and reference length/strain of ligament structures may not fully reproduce the contributions of these structures to joint kinematics that were measured experimentally in the benchmark scenarios. As researchers often extend models beyond the conditions used to calibrate them, quantifying model accuracy and limitations with benchmarking represents a crucial step toward reproducibility and can help establish best practices for credible modeling in our community.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleDeciphering the “Art” in Modeling and Simulation of the Knee Joint: Model Benchmarking
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume148
    journal issue5
    journal titleJournal of Biomechanical Engineering
    identifier doi10.1115/1.4070823
    journal fristpage452
    journal lastpage454
    page3
    treeJournal of Biomechanical Engineering:;2026:;volume( 148 ):;issue:005
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian