YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Turbomachinery
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Turbomachinery
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Nonintrusive Ground Force Decomposition Applied to Turbofans—Part I: Control Volume Development and Uncertainty

    Source: Journal of Turbomachinery:;2026:;volume( 148 ):;issue:004::page 1761
    Author:
    Powers, Sean
    ,
    Hanley, Keaton
    ,
    Lowe, K. Todd
    ,
    Schetz, Joseph
    DOI: 10.1115/1.4069419
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: Abstract. A control volume framework is derived to decompose forces produced by a turbofan with special considerations for application to experimental measurements. The rich history of aerodynamic force decomposition is reviewed. The parallel expanded streamtube (PES) method of Drela was chosen as the best fit for application to experimental data because it allows for realistic measurement types and locations, especially for optical methods. The PES method is extended here using a combination of the Townsend criterion and Prandtl’s turbulent mixing length model to decompose the exhaust stream into the core and bypass flow of a turbofan engine. The methodology uncertainty including random, bias, and control volume error is derived using the propagation of uncertainty technique. Finally, a simple analytically simulated data set is used to test the extended PES (EPES) method and compute the uncertainty. The total error is then presented along with the error influence coefficients assuming uncertain variables such as axial velocity, specific heat ratio, specific gas constant, static temperature, static density, freestream static pressure, freestream velocity, and measurement area. The largest sources of uncertainty were found to be the static temperature and density. In general, the EPES method showed approximately a 1% error in total force, a 2.5% error in core force, and a 2% error in bypass force. This work is applied to real data in Part II of this paper using the filtered Rayleigh scattering technique to gather inlet and exhaust values to measure ground force on a Honeywell TFE-731 turbofan at Virginia Tech’s TurboLab.
    • Download: (1.020Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Nonintrusive Ground Force Decomposition Applied to Turbofans—Part I: Control Volume Development and Uncertainty

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4316605
    Collections
    • Journal of Turbomachinery

    Show full item record

    contributor authorPowers, Sean
    contributor authorHanley, Keaton
    contributor authorLowe, K. Todd
    contributor authorSchetz, Joseph
    date accessioned2026-08-23T08:28:37Z
    date available2026-08-23T08:28:37Z
    date copyright2026/04/01
    date issued2026
    identifier issn0889-504X
    identifier otherturbo-25-1026.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4316605
    description abstractAbstract. A control volume framework is derived to decompose forces produced by a turbofan with special considerations for application to experimental measurements. The rich history of aerodynamic force decomposition is reviewed. The parallel expanded streamtube (PES) method of Drela was chosen as the best fit for application to experimental data because it allows for realistic measurement types and locations, especially for optical methods. The PES method is extended here using a combination of the Townsend criterion and Prandtl’s turbulent mixing length model to decompose the exhaust stream into the core and bypass flow of a turbofan engine. The methodology uncertainty including random, bias, and control volume error is derived using the propagation of uncertainty technique. Finally, a simple analytically simulated data set is used to test the extended PES (EPES) method and compute the uncertainty. The total error is then presented along with the error influence coefficients assuming uncertain variables such as axial velocity, specific heat ratio, specific gas constant, static temperature, static density, freestream static pressure, freestream velocity, and measurement area. The largest sources of uncertainty were found to be the static temperature and density. In general, the EPES method showed approximately a 1% error in total force, a 2.5% error in core force, and a 2% error in bypass force. This work is applied to real data in Part II of this paper using the filtered Rayleigh scattering technique to gather inlet and exhaust values to measure ground force on a Honeywell TFE-731 turbofan at Virginia Tech’s TurboLab.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleNonintrusive Ground Force Decomposition Applied to Turbofans—Part I: Control Volume Development and Uncertainty
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume148
    journal issue4
    journal titleJournal of Turbomachinery
    identifier doi10.1115/1.4069419
    journal fristpage1761
    journal lastpage1771
    page11
    treeJournal of Turbomachinery:;2026:;volume( 148 ):;issue:004
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian