YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Reevaluation of Burst Capacity Models for Corroded Steel Pipelines

    Source: Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering:;2026:;volume( 148 ):;issue:003::page 424
    Author:
    Mokhtari, Mojtaba
    ,
    Melchers, Robert E.
    DOI: 10.1115/1.4070950
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: Abstract. Through-wall pitting is the most common failure mode of concern for high-pressure pipelines as used in the oil and gas industry, both offshore and onshore, potentially allowing loss of containment and environmental pollution. Pipe burst under pressure is also of concern, particularly in high-safety class pipelines. Semiempirical models for predicting pipeline burst capacity vary in their fidelity. Mostly, this has been estimated by benchmarking burst capacity prediction models of undefined conservatism against burst pressure derived from finite element analysis (FEA) of steel pipes with wall defects, such as those caused by corrosion. The most recent of these comparative assessments is reviewed herein, and areas of concern are noted. This is followed by a statistical analysis for performance assessment of several burst capacity models, by comparing their predictions against FEA-generated data, for which both the modeling and the input data appear to have been correctly applied. The results of the analyses allow a more accurate ranking of burst capacity models, considering both predicted mean values and estimates of variability, and provide a basis for making logically consistent comparisons. They also form a basis for the application of safety factors to provide measures of the relative probability of pressure pipe bursts.
    • Download: (1.133Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Reevaluation of Burst Capacity Models for Corroded Steel Pipelines

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4316470
    Collections
    • Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorMokhtari, Mojtaba
    contributor authorMelchers, Robert E.
    date accessioned2026-08-23T08:22:45Z
    date available2026-08-23T08:22:45Z
    date copyright2026/06/01
    date issued2026
    identifier issn0892-7219
    identifier otheromae-25-1121.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4316470
    description abstractAbstract. Through-wall pitting is the most common failure mode of concern for high-pressure pipelines as used in the oil and gas industry, both offshore and onshore, potentially allowing loss of containment and environmental pollution. Pipe burst under pressure is also of concern, particularly in high-safety class pipelines. Semiempirical models for predicting pipeline burst capacity vary in their fidelity. Mostly, this has been estimated by benchmarking burst capacity prediction models of undefined conservatism against burst pressure derived from finite element analysis (FEA) of steel pipes with wall defects, such as those caused by corrosion. The most recent of these comparative assessments is reviewed herein, and areas of concern are noted. This is followed by a statistical analysis for performance assessment of several burst capacity models, by comparing their predictions against FEA-generated data, for which both the modeling and the input data appear to have been correctly applied. The results of the analyses allow a more accurate ranking of burst capacity models, considering both predicted mean values and estimates of variability, and provide a basis for making logically consistent comparisons. They also form a basis for the application of safety factors to provide measures of the relative probability of pressure pipe bursts.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleReevaluation of Burst Capacity Models for Corroded Steel Pipelines
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume148
    journal issue3
    journal titleJournal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering
    identifier doi10.1115/1.4070950
    journal fristpage424
    journal lastpage437
    page14
    treeJournal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering:;2026:;volume( 148 ):;issue:003
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian