YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Fluids Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Fluids Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Evaluation of the Spalart–Allmaras and k–ω GEKO Turbulence Models Relative to k–ω Shear Stress Transport for Centrifugal Pump Simulations With Experimental Validation

    Source: Journal of Fluids Engineering:;2026:;volume( 148 ):;issue:003::page 904
    Author:
    Malki, Sami
    ,
    Gemici, Zafer
    DOI: 10.1115/1.4070080
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: Abstract. This study examines the efficacy of the Spalart–Allmaras and k–ω Generalized k-ω (GEKO) turbulence models in modeling centrifugal pumps in comparison to the commonly utilized k–ω shear stress transport (SST) model. To guarantee precision and reliability, numerical simulations were conducted utilizing computational fluid dynamics (CFD), and the results were juxtaposed with experimental data. The research is segmented into two phases. The initial phase involves numerical experimentation utilizing the pump's computer-aided design models, succeeded by simulations of various flow circumstances employing all three turbulence models. The subsequent step involves laboratory validation, wherein prototypes are tested under identical settings to assess the correlation between numerical predictions and experimental outcomes. The assessment emphasizes essential performance indicators, including velocity and pressure distributions, pump efficiency, and computational duration. The results indicate that the k–ω GEKO and k–ω SST models yield similar conclusions, albeit with differing levels of accuracy depending on the flowrate. At high flow rates, the Spalart–Allmaras model demonstrates the lowest error of 2.71%, succeeded by k–ω SST at 14.74%, and k–ω GEKO at 15.64%. At low flow rates, the k–ω SST model has the maximum accuracy with a 4.08% error, closely succeeded by the Spalart–Allmaras model at 4.57%, but the k–ω GEKO model displays a higher inaccuracy of 6.20%. Furthermore, the Spalart–Allmaras model functions with almost twice the computing efficiency of both GEKO and SST. This study underscores the importance of selecting an appropriate turbulence model, offering valuable insights for engineers and academics engaged in pump design and optimization. These findings highlight the significant impact of turbulence model selection on the accuracy and computational cost of centrifugal pump simulations.
    • Download: (2.222Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Evaluation of the Spalart–Allmaras and k–ω GEKO Turbulence Models Relative to k–ω Shear Stress Transport for Centrifugal Pump Simulations With Experimental Validation

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4316441
    Collections
    • Journal of Fluids Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorMalki, Sami
    contributor authorGemici, Zafer
    date accessioned2026-08-23T08:21:41Z
    date available2026-08-23T08:21:41Z
    date copyright2026/03/01
    date issued2026
    identifier issn0098-2202
    identifier otherfe-25-1310.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4316441
    description abstractAbstract. This study examines the efficacy of the Spalart–Allmaras and k–ω Generalized k-ω (GEKO) turbulence models in modeling centrifugal pumps in comparison to the commonly utilized k–ω shear stress transport (SST) model. To guarantee precision and reliability, numerical simulations were conducted utilizing computational fluid dynamics (CFD), and the results were juxtaposed with experimental data. The research is segmented into two phases. The initial phase involves numerical experimentation utilizing the pump's computer-aided design models, succeeded by simulations of various flow circumstances employing all three turbulence models. The subsequent step involves laboratory validation, wherein prototypes are tested under identical settings to assess the correlation between numerical predictions and experimental outcomes. The assessment emphasizes essential performance indicators, including velocity and pressure distributions, pump efficiency, and computational duration. The results indicate that the k–ω GEKO and k–ω SST models yield similar conclusions, albeit with differing levels of accuracy depending on the flowrate. At high flow rates, the Spalart–Allmaras model demonstrates the lowest error of 2.71%, succeeded by k–ω SST at 14.74%, and k–ω GEKO at 15.64%. At low flow rates, the k–ω SST model has the maximum accuracy with a 4.08% error, closely succeeded by the Spalart–Allmaras model at 4.57%, but the k–ω GEKO model displays a higher inaccuracy of 6.20%. Furthermore, the Spalart–Allmaras model functions with almost twice the computing efficiency of both GEKO and SST. This study underscores the importance of selecting an appropriate turbulence model, offering valuable insights for engineers and academics engaged in pump design and optimization. These findings highlight the significant impact of turbulence model selection on the accuracy and computational cost of centrifugal pump simulations.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleEvaluation of the Spalart–Allmaras and k–ω GEKO Turbulence Models Relative to k–ω Shear Stress Transport for Centrifugal Pump Simulations With Experimental Validation
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume148
    journal issue3
    journal titleJournal of Fluids Engineering
    identifier doi10.1115/1.4070080
    journal fristpage904
    journal lastpage910
    page7
    treeJournal of Fluids Engineering:;2026:;volume( 148 ):;issue:003
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian