Reliable Benchmarking of Breast Ultrasound Lesion Classification Requires Patient-Level ValidationSource: Journal of Engineering and Science in Medical Diagnostics and Therapy:;2026:;volume( 009 ):;issue:004::page 209Author:Wang, Lulu
DOI: 10.1115/1.4071712Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
Abstract: Abstract. Breast ultrasound is widely used for lesion characterization, yet reported deep-learning performance varies substantially with dataset composition, preprocessing, and validation design. A major source of bias arises when patient-level separation is not enforced, allowing correlated images from the same subject to inflate performance estimates. This study presents a leakage-aware benchmark of convolutional neural networks (CNNs), a Vision Transformer (ViT), and a CNN–transformer late-fusion configuration for benign-versus-malignant breast ultrasound classification on the BUS-UCLM dataset. After exclusion of normal-category images, the final cohort comprised 264 images from 36 patients, including 174 benign and 90 malignant images. Seven CNN-family models, one ViT baseline, and one ResNet18–ViT probability-level late-fusion configuration were evaluated using strict patient-level fivefold cross-validation. Additional analyses included fusion ablation, paired Wilcoxon signed-rank testing, gradient-weighted class activation mapping (Grad-CAM) visualization, and an image-level leakage demonstration. Under strict patient-level evaluation, performance was moderate across all models. GoogLeNet achieved the highest mean accuracy (61.48%), InceptionV3 achieved the highest mean macro-F1 (59.24%), and ResNet50 achieved the highest mean area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) (0.6699), whereas the standalone ViT showed weaker overall discrimination. The late-fusion configuration remained competitive in threshold-dependent metrics but did not surpass the strongest CNN baselines in AUC. Overall, no architecture demonstrated a clear advantage across both threshold-dependent and threshold-independent metrics. By contrast, image-level splitting substantially inflated apparent performance, underscoring the importance of rigorous patient-level separation for credible benchmarking in breast ultrasound classification.
|
Show full item record
| contributor author | Wang, Lulu | |
| date accessioned | 2026-08-23T08:03:17Z | |
| date available | 2026-08-23T08:03:17Z | |
| date copyright | 2026/11/01 | |
| date issued | 2026 | |
| identifier issn | 2572-7958 | |
| identifier other | jesmdt-26-1007.pdf | |
| identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4316011 | |
| description abstract | Abstract. Breast ultrasound is widely used for lesion characterization, yet reported deep-learning performance varies substantially with dataset composition, preprocessing, and validation design. A major source of bias arises when patient-level separation is not enforced, allowing correlated images from the same subject to inflate performance estimates. This study presents a leakage-aware benchmark of convolutional neural networks (CNNs), a Vision Transformer (ViT), and a CNN–transformer late-fusion configuration for benign-versus-malignant breast ultrasound classification on the BUS-UCLM dataset. After exclusion of normal-category images, the final cohort comprised 264 images from 36 patients, including 174 benign and 90 malignant images. Seven CNN-family models, one ViT baseline, and one ResNet18–ViT probability-level late-fusion configuration were evaluated using strict patient-level fivefold cross-validation. Additional analyses included fusion ablation, paired Wilcoxon signed-rank testing, gradient-weighted class activation mapping (Grad-CAM) visualization, and an image-level leakage demonstration. Under strict patient-level evaluation, performance was moderate across all models. GoogLeNet achieved the highest mean accuracy (61.48%), InceptionV3 achieved the highest mean macro-F1 (59.24%), and ResNet50 achieved the highest mean area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) (0.6699), whereas the standalone ViT showed weaker overall discrimination. The late-fusion configuration remained competitive in threshold-dependent metrics but did not surpass the strongest CNN baselines in AUC. Overall, no architecture demonstrated a clear advantage across both threshold-dependent and threshold-independent metrics. By contrast, image-level splitting substantially inflated apparent performance, underscoring the importance of rigorous patient-level separation for credible benchmarking in breast ultrasound classification. | |
| publisher | The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) | |
| title | Reliable Benchmarking of Breast Ultrasound Lesion Classification Requires Patient-Level Validation | |
| type | Journal Paper | |
| journal volume | 9 | |
| journal issue | 4 | |
| journal title | Journal of Engineering and Science in Medical Diagnostics and Therapy | |
| identifier doi | 10.1115/1.4071712 | |
| journal fristpage | 209 | |
| journal lastpage | 249 | |
| page | 41 | |
| tree | Journal of Engineering and Science in Medical Diagnostics and Therapy:;2026:;volume( 009 ):;issue:004 | |
| contenttype | Fulltext |