YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • ASME Journal of Engineering for Sustainable Buildings and Cities
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • ASME Journal of Engineering for Sustainable Buildings and Cities
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Developing Residential Building Sustainability Assessment Framework: Delphi Consultation Approach

    Source: ASME Journal of Engineering for Sustainable Buildings and Cities:;2026:;volume( 007 ):;issue:001
    Author:
    Assadiki, Redouan
    ,
    Merlin, Gérard
    ,
    Buhé, Catherine
    ,
    Boileau, Hervé
    ,
    Belmir, Fouzi
    DOI: 10.1115/1.4070491
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: Abstract. Green building rating systems aim to evaluate and improve the environmental performance of buildings. While international rating systems are recognized global scale, others are adapted to the specific requirements of countries. The Moroccan Building Sustainability Assessment Framework (MBSAF) for residential buildings was developed using a triple bottom line approach to sustainability, explicitly reflecting Morocco's environmental, economic, and social priorities. Assessment categories were selected through a two-round Delphi method, applying experts from academia, architecture, and engineering consulting firms. Interrater Agreement demonstrated progressive consensus, with Kendall's W progressing from 0.12 to 0.25. Chi-square across 28 degrees of freedom confirmed the convergence of expert opinions and highlighted the influence of professional affiliation on judgment patterns. The final MBSAF framework comprises 13 assessment categories and 50 subcategories. Health and well-being (HW), Energy efficiency (EE), and Life Cycle Cost (LCC) emerged as the highest priority categories. Developed collaboratively with a panel of local experts, the framework reflects national sustainability needs while remaining methodologically robust. Behind its contextual relevance, MBSAF demonstrates how locally adapted rating systems can coexist with international systems, enhancing local applicability while supporting cross-border comparability, knowledge exchange, and collaboration in sustainable construction.
    • Download: (1.561Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Developing Residential Building Sustainability Assessment Framework: Delphi Consultation Approach

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4315933
    Collections
    • ASME Journal of Engineering for Sustainable Buildings and Cities

    Show full item record

    contributor authorAssadiki, Redouan
    contributor authorMerlin, Gérard
    contributor authorBuhé, Catherine
    contributor authorBoileau, Hervé
    contributor authorBelmir, Fouzi
    date accessioned2026-08-23T08:00:13Z
    date available2026-08-23T08:00:13Z
    date copyright2026/02/01
    date issued2026
    identifier issn2642-6641
    identifier otherjesbc-25-1038.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4315933
    description abstractAbstract. Green building rating systems aim to evaluate and improve the environmental performance of buildings. While international rating systems are recognized global scale, others are adapted to the specific requirements of countries. The Moroccan Building Sustainability Assessment Framework (MBSAF) for residential buildings was developed using a triple bottom line approach to sustainability, explicitly reflecting Morocco's environmental, economic, and social priorities. Assessment categories were selected through a two-round Delphi method, applying experts from academia, architecture, and engineering consulting firms. Interrater Agreement demonstrated progressive consensus, with Kendall's W progressing from 0.12 to 0.25. Chi-square across 28 degrees of freedom confirmed the convergence of expert opinions and highlighted the influence of professional affiliation on judgment patterns. The final MBSAF framework comprises 13 assessment categories and 50 subcategories. Health and well-being (HW), Energy efficiency (EE), and Life Cycle Cost (LCC) emerged as the highest priority categories. Developed collaboratively with a panel of local experts, the framework reflects national sustainability needs while remaining methodologically robust. Behind its contextual relevance, MBSAF demonstrates how locally adapted rating systems can coexist with international systems, enhancing local applicability while supporting cross-border comparability, knowledge exchange, and collaboration in sustainable construction.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleDeveloping Residential Building Sustainability Assessment Framework: Delphi Consultation Approach
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume7
    journal issue1
    journal titleASME Journal of Engineering for Sustainable Buildings and Cities
    identifier doi10.1115/1.4070491
    treeASME Journal of Engineering for Sustainable Buildings and Cities:;2026:;volume( 007 ):;issue:001
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian