YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • ASME Open Journal of Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • ASME Open Journal of Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    The Current State of Dimensioning and Tolerancing Pedagogy in United States Post-Secondary Engineering and Engineering Technology Programs

    Source: ASME Open Journal of Engineering:;2025:;volume( 004 ):;issue:00::page 235
    Author:
    Berez, Jaime
    ,
    Webster, Rustin
    ,
    Ottway, Rudy
    DOI: 10.1115/1.4069218
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: Abstract. Dimensioning and tolerancing (D&T) is understood to be a crucial element of the engineering product lifecycle and has been documented as an important skill for various careers, e.g., engineering, design, manufacturing, and metrology. Even so, there is a widely perceived skills gap in today's workforce. In response to this perceived misalignment between employer expectations and student preparation, a survey of post-secondary engineering and engineering technology (ET) degree programs in the United States was conducted to quantitatively characterize the current state of D&T pedagogy. Respondents (n = 67) who identified as being the instructor-of-record for a course(s) that required students to understand, apply, and/or analyze D&T topics were asked to characterize their fitness to teach said course(s), the extent of topical coverage, instructional techniques and challenges, and perceptions of student proficiency. A particular focus was placed on assessing how geometric dimensioning and tolerancing (GD&T) is integrated into engineering and ET classrooms. Results indicate that D&T is a mandatory component of curricula for approximately three quarters of students, but less than one third consistently receive instruction in GD&T. For what coverage there is, fundamental topics such as datum reference frames and the envelope principle were often rated as of relatively low importance by instructors. Challenges which appear to contribute include limited instructional time, sparse and expensive educational resources, and lacking instructor expertise.
    • Download: (1.050Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      The Current State of Dimensioning and Tolerancing Pedagogy in United States Post-Secondary Engineering and Engineering Technology Programs

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4315837
    Collections
    • ASME Open Journal of Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorBerez, Jaime
    contributor authorWebster, Rustin
    contributor authorOttway, Rudy
    date accessioned2026-08-23T07:56:34Z
    date available2026-08-23T07:56:34Z
    date copyright2025/01/01
    date issued2025
    identifier otheraoje-25-1008.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4315837
    description abstractAbstract. Dimensioning and tolerancing (D&T) is understood to be a crucial element of the engineering product lifecycle and has been documented as an important skill for various careers, e.g., engineering, design, manufacturing, and metrology. Even so, there is a widely perceived skills gap in today's workforce. In response to this perceived misalignment between employer expectations and student preparation, a survey of post-secondary engineering and engineering technology (ET) degree programs in the United States was conducted to quantitatively characterize the current state of D&T pedagogy. Respondents (n = 67) who identified as being the instructor-of-record for a course(s) that required students to understand, apply, and/or analyze D&T topics were asked to characterize their fitness to teach said course(s), the extent of topical coverage, instructional techniques and challenges, and perceptions of student proficiency. A particular focus was placed on assessing how geometric dimensioning and tolerancing (GD&T) is integrated into engineering and ET classrooms. Results indicate that D&T is a mandatory component of curricula for approximately three quarters of students, but less than one third consistently receive instruction in GD&T. For what coverage there is, fundamental topics such as datum reference frames and the envelope principle were often rated as of relatively low importance by instructors. Challenges which appear to contribute include limited instructional time, sparse and expensive educational resources, and lacking instructor expertise.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleThe Current State of Dimensioning and Tolerancing Pedagogy in United States Post-Secondary Engineering and Engineering Technology Programs
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume4
    journal titleASME Open Journal of Engineering
    identifier doi10.1115/1.4069218
    journal fristpage235
    journal lastpage253
    page19
    treeASME Open Journal of Engineering:;2025:;volume( 004 ):;issue:00
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian