YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Finite Element Study of Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Constructs Near Cervicothoracic Junction—Is T2 Modeling Necessary?

    Source: Journal of Biomechanical Engineering:;2026:;volume( 148 ):;issue:001::page 737
    Author:
    Chris Asir, J. A. Febin
    ,
    Jebaseelan, D. Davidson
    ,
    Bosco, Aju
    ,
    Harinathan, Balaji
    ,
    Yoganandan, Narayan
    DOI: 10.1115/1.4070409
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: Abstract. Cervical spine finite element (FE) models often terminate at T1, which may introduce boundary-induced alterations, particularly at the cervicothoracic junction (C7–T1). This is relevant in multilevel anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) constructs that terminate at C7, leaving C7–T1 as the inferior adjacent segment. This study analyzes the biomechanical response of a three-level ACDF, which included the lowest cervical vertebra C7, using two FE models: a conventional C2–T1 model and an extended C2–T2 model. Postoperative range of motion (ROM) is evaluated under physiological flexion and extension loads of 2 N·m. A 7% increase in flexion ROM was observed in the C2–T2 ACDF model at C7–T1 when compared with the C2–T1 ACDF model. This change reflected the influence of shifting the inferior boundary to T2. The findings demonstrate that adding T2 preserved global kinematics, but the increase in the adjacent segment mobility (C7–T1) may lead to disc degeneration. The influence of rib and the responses under dynamic loading conditions have to be assessed for the use of caudal multilevel constructs in cervical spine modeling.
    • Download: (1.147Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Finite Element Study of Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Constructs Near Cervicothoracic Junction—Is T2 Modeling Necessary?

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4315731
    Collections
    • Journal of Biomechanical Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorChris Asir, J. A. Febin
    contributor authorJebaseelan, D. Davidson
    contributor authorBosco, Aju
    contributor authorHarinathan, Balaji
    contributor authorYoganandan, Narayan
    date accessioned2026-08-23T07:52:09Z
    date available2026-08-23T07:52:09Z
    date copyright2026/01/01
    date issued2026
    identifier issn0148-0731
    identifier otherbio-25-1236.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4315731
    description abstractAbstract. Cervical spine finite element (FE) models often terminate at T1, which may introduce boundary-induced alterations, particularly at the cervicothoracic junction (C7–T1). This is relevant in multilevel anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) constructs that terminate at C7, leaving C7–T1 as the inferior adjacent segment. This study analyzes the biomechanical response of a three-level ACDF, which included the lowest cervical vertebra C7, using two FE models: a conventional C2–T1 model and an extended C2–T2 model. Postoperative range of motion (ROM) is evaluated under physiological flexion and extension loads of 2 N·m. A 7% increase in flexion ROM was observed in the C2–T2 ACDF model at C7–T1 when compared with the C2–T1 ACDF model. This change reflected the influence of shifting the inferior boundary to T2. The findings demonstrate that adding T2 preserved global kinematics, but the increase in the adjacent segment mobility (C7–T1) may lead to disc degeneration. The influence of rib and the responses under dynamic loading conditions have to be assessed for the use of caudal multilevel constructs in cervical spine modeling.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleFinite Element Study of Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Constructs Near Cervicothoracic Junction—Is T2 Modeling Necessary?
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume148
    journal issue1
    journal titleJournal of Biomechanical Engineering
    identifier doi10.1115/1.4070409
    journal fristpage737
    journal lastpage744
    page8
    treeJournal of Biomechanical Engineering:;2026:;volume( 148 ):;issue:001
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian