YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Electrochemical Energy Conversion and Storage
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Electrochemical Energy Conversion and Storage
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Thermal Runaway Propagation—Critical Variables and Protocols

    Source: Journal of Electrochemical Energy Conversion and Storage:;2026:;volume( 023 ):;issue:002::page 2725
    Author:
    Kwon, Byoungchul
    ,
    Jeevarajan, Judith A.
    DOI: 10.1115/1.4071293
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: Abstract. This study describes the efforts taken to determine the variables that are critical to obtain consistent and repeatable results to initiate thermal runaway in Li-ion multicell packages and modules. In this study, lithium primary cells were also studied under similar conditions. A series of tests was conducted to evaluate the effects of various parameters that need to be considered when designing experimental studies to investigate the thermal runaway behaviors of Li-ion batteries. The results show that a heating rate of 5–10 °C/min produced the most stable and consistent results compared to higher or lower heating rates, but 10 °C/min was chosen as the standard for a majority of the tests. The control thermocouple positioned 5 mm from a heater provided more accurate measurements of the heating rate of the cell avoiding excessively high temperatures near the heater. The comparison between two heating methods, a heater and an oven, showed that the heater offered better control of the heating rate but can be the cause of other unexpected reactions due to venting of semisolids from the cell if the temperatures exceeded a certain limit, whereas the oven heating provided uniform heating across the cell surface by convective heating. The states-of-charge (SOCs) greatly affected the propagation of thermal runaway between Li-ion cells. The results highlight the importance of test configuration and settings which may impact the outcome of the tests.
    • Download: (1.762Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Thermal Runaway Propagation—Critical Variables and Protocols

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4315719
    Collections
    • Journal of Electrochemical Energy Conversion and Storage

    Show full item record

    contributor authorKwon, Byoungchul
    contributor authorJeevarajan, Judith A.
    date accessioned2026-08-23T07:51:42Z
    date available2026-08-23T07:51:42Z
    date copyright2026/05/01
    date issued2026
    identifier issn2381-6872
    identifier otherjeecs-25-1222.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4315719
    description abstractAbstract. This study describes the efforts taken to determine the variables that are critical to obtain consistent and repeatable results to initiate thermal runaway in Li-ion multicell packages and modules. In this study, lithium primary cells were also studied under similar conditions. A series of tests was conducted to evaluate the effects of various parameters that need to be considered when designing experimental studies to investigate the thermal runaway behaviors of Li-ion batteries. The results show that a heating rate of 5–10 °C/min produced the most stable and consistent results compared to higher or lower heating rates, but 10 °C/min was chosen as the standard for a majority of the tests. The control thermocouple positioned 5 mm from a heater provided more accurate measurements of the heating rate of the cell avoiding excessively high temperatures near the heater. The comparison between two heating methods, a heater and an oven, showed that the heater offered better control of the heating rate but can be the cause of other unexpected reactions due to venting of semisolids from the cell if the temperatures exceeded a certain limit, whereas the oven heating provided uniform heating across the cell surface by convective heating. The states-of-charge (SOCs) greatly affected the propagation of thermal runaway between Li-ion cells. The results highlight the importance of test configuration and settings which may impact the outcome of the tests.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleThermal Runaway Propagation—Critical Variables and Protocols
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume23
    journal issue2
    journal titleJournal of Electrochemical Energy Conversion and Storage
    identifier doi10.1115/1.4071293
    journal fristpage2725
    journal lastpage2733
    page9
    treeJournal of Electrochemical Energy Conversion and Storage:;2026:;volume( 023 ):;issue:002
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian