Fission within FusionSource: Mechanical Engineering:;2026:;volume( 148 ):;issue:001::page 1Author:Abrams, Michael
DOI: 10.1115/1.2026-Jan2Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
Abstract: Abstract. Despite decades of effort and billions in investment, there is not yet a fusion technology that has achieved sustained commercial net energy output. The conventional approach to fusion involves doughnut-shaped magnetic containers called tokamaks, but some well-funded startups are pursuing radically different methods, fueled by the broader belief that one of these competing paths will eventually succeed.
|
Collections
Show full item record
| contributor author | Abrams, Michael | |
| date accessioned | 2026-08-23T07:29:08Z | |
| date available | 2026-08-23T07:29:08Z | |
| date copyright | 2026/01/01 | |
| date issued | 2026 | |
| identifier issn | 0025-6501 | |
| identifier other | me-2026-jan2.pdf | |
| identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4315162 | |
| description abstract | Abstract. Despite decades of effort and billions in investment, there is not yet a fusion technology that has achieved sustained commercial net energy output. The conventional approach to fusion involves doughnut-shaped magnetic containers called tokamaks, but some well-funded startups are pursuing radically different methods, fueled by the broader belief that one of these competing paths will eventually succeed. | |
| publisher | The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) | |
| title | Fission within Fusion | |
| type | Journal Paper | |
| journal volume | 148 | |
| journal issue | 1 | |
| journal title | Mechanical Engineering | |
| identifier doi | 10.1115/1.2026-Jan2 | |
| journal fristpage | 1 | |
| journal lastpage | 7 | |
| page | 7 | |
| tree | Mechanical Engineering:;2026:;volume( 148 ):;issue:001 | |
| contenttype | Fulltext |