YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Tribology
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Tribology
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Exploring Compatibility Limits for Lubricating Grease Formulations

    Source: Journal of Tribology:;2026:;volume( 148 ):;issue:008::page 44
    Author:
    Shah, Raj
    ,
    Lotwin, Michael
    ,
    Dodos, George S.
    DOI: 10.1115/1.4070953
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: Abstract. Grease compatibility is an important consideration for end-users and grease suppliers. In the process of replacing lubricating greases, the issue is whether two greases can safely be combined or whether mixing them will decrease performance and even damage equipment. Almost 60% of global grease consumption is based on lithium soap thickener chemistry, so finding alternatives and determining their compatibility is imperative. The experimental compatibility limits of different greases in the current work were examined by preparing binary blends of a reference lithium complex grease (LiX) with three possible substitute thickener types: aluminum complex (AlX), polyurea (PU), and calcium sulfonate complex (CaSX) greases. Three blending ratios (10:90, 25:75, 50:50) for each couple were used to model partial or near-complete grease substitution. In total, nine mixed samples and four unmixed samples were tested in accordance with the ASTM D6185 standard for grease compatibility. First-order test criteria of importance were dropping point, shear stability, and high-temperature storage stability, and secondary tests included windfall storage stability and antiwear performance. The results showed that the lithium complex–polyurea combination achieved the highest compatibility score overall, while the lithium complex–calcium sulfonate complex blends were the least compatible by ASTM criteria.
    • Download: (1.081Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Exploring Compatibility Limits for Lubricating Grease Formulations

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4315049
    Collections
    • Journal of Tribology

    Show full item record

    contributor authorShah, Raj
    contributor authorLotwin, Michael
    contributor authorDodos, George S.
    date accessioned2026-08-23T07:24:04Z
    date available2026-08-23T07:24:04Z
    date copyright2026/08/01
    date issued2026
    identifier issn0742-4787
    identifier othertrib-25-1493.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4315049
    description abstractAbstract. Grease compatibility is an important consideration for end-users and grease suppliers. In the process of replacing lubricating greases, the issue is whether two greases can safely be combined or whether mixing them will decrease performance and even damage equipment. Almost 60% of global grease consumption is based on lithium soap thickener chemistry, so finding alternatives and determining their compatibility is imperative. The experimental compatibility limits of different greases in the current work were examined by preparing binary blends of a reference lithium complex grease (LiX) with three possible substitute thickener types: aluminum complex (AlX), polyurea (PU), and calcium sulfonate complex (CaSX) greases. Three blending ratios (10:90, 25:75, 50:50) for each couple were used to model partial or near-complete grease substitution. In total, nine mixed samples and four unmixed samples were tested in accordance with the ASTM D6185 standard for grease compatibility. First-order test criteria of importance were dropping point, shear stability, and high-temperature storage stability, and secondary tests included windfall storage stability and antiwear performance. The results showed that the lithium complex–polyurea combination achieved the highest compatibility score overall, while the lithium complex–calcium sulfonate complex blends were the least compatible by ASTM criteria.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleExploring Compatibility Limits for Lubricating Grease Formulations
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume148
    journal issue8
    journal titleJournal of Tribology
    identifier doi10.1115/1.4070953
    journal fristpage44
    journal lastpage46
    page3
    treeJournal of Tribology:;2026:;volume( 148 ):;issue:008
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian