Exploring Compatibility Limits for Lubricating Grease FormulationsSource: Journal of Tribology:;2026:;volume( 148 ):;issue:008::page 44DOI: 10.1115/1.4070953Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
Abstract: Abstract. Grease compatibility is an important consideration for end-users and grease suppliers. In the process of replacing lubricating greases, the issue is whether two greases can safely be combined or whether mixing them will decrease performance and even damage equipment. Almost 60% of global grease consumption is based on lithium soap thickener chemistry, so finding alternatives and determining their compatibility is imperative. The experimental compatibility limits of different greases in the current work were examined by preparing binary blends of a reference lithium complex grease (LiX) with three possible substitute thickener types: aluminum complex (AlX), polyurea (PU), and calcium sulfonate complex (CaSX) greases. Three blending ratios (10:90, 25:75, 50:50) for each couple were used to model partial or near-complete grease substitution. In total, nine mixed samples and four unmixed samples were tested in accordance with the ASTM D6185 standard for grease compatibility. First-order test criteria of importance were dropping point, shear stability, and high-temperature storage stability, and secondary tests included windfall storage stability and antiwear performance. The results showed that the lithium complex–polyurea combination achieved the highest compatibility score overall, while the lithium complex–calcium sulfonate complex blends were the least compatible by ASTM criteria.
|
Collections
Show full item record
| contributor author | Shah, Raj | |
| contributor author | Lotwin, Michael | |
| contributor author | Dodos, George S. | |
| date accessioned | 2026-08-23T07:24:04Z | |
| date available | 2026-08-23T07:24:04Z | |
| date copyright | 2026/08/01 | |
| date issued | 2026 | |
| identifier issn | 0742-4787 | |
| identifier other | trib-25-1493.pdf | |
| identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4315049 | |
| description abstract | Abstract. Grease compatibility is an important consideration for end-users and grease suppliers. In the process of replacing lubricating greases, the issue is whether two greases can safely be combined or whether mixing them will decrease performance and even damage equipment. Almost 60% of global grease consumption is based on lithium soap thickener chemistry, so finding alternatives and determining their compatibility is imperative. The experimental compatibility limits of different greases in the current work were examined by preparing binary blends of a reference lithium complex grease (LiX) with three possible substitute thickener types: aluminum complex (AlX), polyurea (PU), and calcium sulfonate complex (CaSX) greases. Three blending ratios (10:90, 25:75, 50:50) for each couple were used to model partial or near-complete grease substitution. In total, nine mixed samples and four unmixed samples were tested in accordance with the ASTM D6185 standard for grease compatibility. First-order test criteria of importance were dropping point, shear stability, and high-temperature storage stability, and secondary tests included windfall storage stability and antiwear performance. The results showed that the lithium complex–polyurea combination achieved the highest compatibility score overall, while the lithium complex–calcium sulfonate complex blends were the least compatible by ASTM criteria. | |
| publisher | The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) | |
| title | Exploring Compatibility Limits for Lubricating Grease Formulations | |
| type | Journal Paper | |
| journal volume | 148 | |
| journal issue | 8 | |
| journal title | Journal of Tribology | |
| identifier doi | 10.1115/1.4070953 | |
| journal fristpage | 44 | |
| journal lastpage | 46 | |
| page | 3 | |
| tree | Journal of Tribology:;2026:;volume( 148 ):;issue:008 | |
| contenttype | Fulltext |