YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Mechanical Design
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Mechanical Design
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Investigating Social Relevance and Knowledge Construction in Engineering Design Research Published in the Journals of Mechanical Design and Mechanisms and Robotics

    Source: Journal of Mechanical Design:;2026:;volume( 148 ):;issue:007::page 1049
    Author:
    Parkinson, Bethany
    ,
    Kiani, Gul-e-Fatima
    ,
    Frecker, Mary I.
    ,
    Toh, Christine A.
    DOI: 10.1115/1.4071516
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: Abstract. Engineering design research is evolving to incorporate socially relevant themes such as justice, ethics, and sustainability. With this evolution, new methods, theories, and concepts are introduced, resulting in a need for strategies aimed at gaining disciplinary depth and increased impact on other disciplines. This study examines how knowledge is constructed in engineering design research by analyzing articles published in well-respected venues for this field: the Journal of Mechanical Design (JMD) and the Journal of Mechanisms and Robotics (JMR). Using a systematic literature review, we analyze all JMD and JMR articles published in 2023 for discussion of social relevance, goal function (agentic/communal), and goal type (the type of knowledge construction it employs). Our findings show that research with communal goals, primarily “working with people” and “helping others,” tends to employ fortifying functions by refining and validating established methods. In contrast, agentic research is primarily focused on success in a particular role and relies on the advancing function by exploring the use of new theories, concepts, and methods in design contexts. This study critically examines how knowledge is constructed in engineering design research and provides a foundation for clarifying disciplinary identity and strengthening intellectual contributions. Because communal goals are associated with higher participation of women, these findings may inform strategies for improving diversity and inclusion in engineering design research.
    • Download: (1.322Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Investigating Social Relevance and Knowledge Construction in Engineering Design Research Published in the Journals of Mechanical Design and Mechanisms and Robotics

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4314936
    Collections
    • Journal of Mechanical Design

    Show full item record

    contributor authorParkinson, Bethany
    contributor authorKiani, Gul-e-Fatima
    contributor authorFrecker, Mary I.
    contributor authorToh, Christine A.
    date accessioned2026-08-23T07:19:25Z
    date available2026-08-23T07:19:25Z
    date copyright2026/07/01
    date issued2026
    identifier issn1050-0472
    identifier othermd-25-1708.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4314936
    description abstractAbstract. Engineering design research is evolving to incorporate socially relevant themes such as justice, ethics, and sustainability. With this evolution, new methods, theories, and concepts are introduced, resulting in a need for strategies aimed at gaining disciplinary depth and increased impact on other disciplines. This study examines how knowledge is constructed in engineering design research by analyzing articles published in well-respected venues for this field: the Journal of Mechanical Design (JMD) and the Journal of Mechanisms and Robotics (JMR). Using a systematic literature review, we analyze all JMD and JMR articles published in 2023 for discussion of social relevance, goal function (agentic/communal), and goal type (the type of knowledge construction it employs). Our findings show that research with communal goals, primarily “working with people” and “helping others,” tends to employ fortifying functions by refining and validating established methods. In contrast, agentic research is primarily focused on success in a particular role and relies on the advancing function by exploring the use of new theories, concepts, and methods in design contexts. This study critically examines how knowledge is constructed in engineering design research and provides a foundation for clarifying disciplinary identity and strengthening intellectual contributions. Because communal goals are associated with higher participation of women, these findings may inform strategies for improving diversity and inclusion in engineering design research.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleInvestigating Social Relevance and Knowledge Construction in Engineering Design Research Published in the Journals of Mechanical Design and Mechanisms and Robotics
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume148
    journal issue7
    journal titleJournal of Mechanical Design
    identifier doi10.1115/1.4071516
    journal fristpage1049
    journal lastpage1077
    page29
    treeJournal of Mechanical Design:;2026:;volume( 148 ):;issue:007
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian